文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.

作者信息

Atkinson Connor J, Seth Ishith, Xie Yi, Ross Richard J, Hunter-Smith David J, Rozen Warren M, Cuomo Roberto

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 4;13(3):900. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030900.


DOI:10.3390/jcm13030900
PMID:38337594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856538/
Abstract

: The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has led to the development of large language models that can address various medical queries, including intraoperatively. This study investigates the potential of ChatGPT in addressing intraoperative questions during the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap procedure. : A series of six intraoperative questions specific to the DIEP flap procedure, derived from real-world clinical scenarios, were proposed to ChatGPT. A panel of four experienced board-certified plastic surgeons evaluated ChatGPT's performance in providing accurate, relevant, and comprehensible responses. : The Likert scale demonstrated to be medically accurate, systematic in presentation, and logical when providing alternative solutions. The mean readability score of the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 28.7 (±0.8), the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 12.4 (±0.5), and the Coleman-Liau Index was 14.5 (±0.5). Suitability-wise, the DISCERN score of ChatGPT was 48 (±2.5) indicating suitable and comprehensible language for experts. : Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can serve as a supplementary tool for surgeons to offer valuable insights and foster intraoperative problem-solving abilities. However, it lacks consideration of individual patient factors and surgical nuances. Nevertheless, further refinement of its training data and rigorous scrutiny under experts to ensure the accuracy and up-to-date nature of the information holds the potential for it to be utilized in the surgical field.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/02cb8c102836/jcm-13-00900-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/46f0a201baf7/jcm-13-00900-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/22d3d2098722/jcm-13-00900-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/3db00cda592d/jcm-13-00900-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/26f9e2d5e2d4/jcm-13-00900-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/cb82455a026c/jcm-13-00900-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/02cb8c102836/jcm-13-00900-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/46f0a201baf7/jcm-13-00900-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/22d3d2098722/jcm-13-00900-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/3db00cda592d/jcm-13-00900-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/26f9e2d5e2d4/jcm-13-00900-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/cb82455a026c/jcm-13-00900-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6adc/10856538/02cb8c102836/jcm-13-00900-g006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Artificial Intelligence Language Model Performance for Rapid Intraoperative Queries in Plastic Surgery: ChatGPT and the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.

J Clin Med. 2024-2-4

[2]
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence's Role in Teaching the Reporting and Interpretation of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Preoperative Planning of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.

JPRAS Open. 2024-4-5

[3]
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-14

[4]
Comparing the Efficacy of Large Language Models ChatGPT, BARD, and Bing AI in Providing Information on Rhinoplasty: An Observational Study.

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023-9-14

[5]
Large Language Models for Intraoperative Decision Support in Plastic Surgery: A Comparison between ChatGPT-4 and Gemini.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024-6-8

[6]
Comparison of large language models in management advice for melanoma: Google's AI BARD, BingAI and ChatGPT.

Skin Health Dis. 2023-11-28

[7]
Investigating the impact of innovative AI chatbot on post-pandemic medical education and clinical assistance: a comprehensive analysis.

ANZ J Surg. 2024-2

[8]
ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023-12-13

[9]
Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients.

Vascular. 2025-2

[10]
Appraisal of ChatGPT's responses to common patient questions regarding Tommy John surgery.

Shoulder Elbow. 2024-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Editorial for the Special Issue "Hot Topics and Innovations in Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery/Aesthetic Medicine".

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-8-18

[2]
Artificial Intelligence in Microsurgical Planning: A Five-Year Leap in Clinical Translation.

J Clin Med. 2025-6-27

[3]
A structured evaluation of LLM-generated step-by-step instructions in cadaveric brachial plexus dissection.

BMC Med Educ. 2025-7-1

[4]
Enhancing patient education in breast surgery: artificial intelligence-powered guidance for mastopexy, augmentation, reduction, and reconstruction.

Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2025-4-25

[5]
Management of Dupuytren's Disease: A Multi-Centric Comparative Analysis Between Experienced Hand Surgeons Versus Artificial Intelligence.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-2-28

[6]
AI in Dental Radiology-Improving the Efficiency of Reporting With ChatGPT: Comparative Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-12-23

[7]
Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery, where do we stand?

JPRAS Open. 2024-9-14

[8]
Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024-9-14

[9]
Large Language Models for Intraoperative Decision Support in Plastic Surgery: A Comparison between ChatGPT-4 and Gemini.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024-6-8

[10]
Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty Patients.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-11

本文引用的文献

[1]
Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing Free Flaps Monitoring in Head and Neck Tumor Treatment.

Crit Rev Oncog. 2023

[2]
A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT consultation quality for augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis between plastic surgeons and laypersons.

Int J Med Inform. 2023-11

[3]
Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT-4 in Responding to Common Questions About Abdominoplasty: An AI-Based Case Study of a Plastic Surgery Consultation.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-4

[4]
The Artificial Intelligence application in Aesthetic Medicine: How ChatGPT can Revolutionize the Aesthetic World.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023-10

[5]
Performance of ChatGPT on the Plastic Surgery Inservice Training Examination.

Aesthet Surg J. 2023-11-16

[6]
Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023-10

[7]
Expanding Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Research With ChatGPT.

Aesthet Surg J. 2023-7-15

[8]
Let's Chat About Chatbots: Additional Thoughts on ChatGPT and Its Role in Plastic Surgery Along With Its Ability to Perform Systematic Reviews.

Aesthet Surg J. 2023-6-14

[9]
Application of ChatGPT in Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: Ally or Antagonist?

Aesthet Surg J. 2023-6-14

[10]
Textbook outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a Delphi study to establish consensus.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索