Teufel Jenny, López Hernández Viviana, Greiter Anita, Kampffmeyer Nele, Hilbert Inga, Eckerstorfer Michael, Narendja Frank, Heissenberger Andreas, Simon Samson
Öko-Institut e.V., Merzhauser Strasse 173, 79100 Freiburg, Germany.
Environment Agency Austria, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Foods. 2024 Jan 23;13(3):369. doi: 10.3390/foods13030369.
The EU's regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) was developed for "classical" transgenic GMOs, yet advancements in so-called "new genomic techniques (NGTs)" have led to implementation challenges regarding detection and identification. As traceability can complement detection and identification strategies, improvements to the existing traceability strategy for GMOs are investigated in this study. Our results are based on a comprehensive analysis of existing traceability systems for globally traded agricultural products, with a focus on soy. Alternative traceability strategies in other sectors were also analysed. One focus was on traceability strategies for products with characteristics for which there are no analytical verification methods. Examples include imports of "conflict minerals" into the EU. The so-called EU Conflict Minerals Regulation requires importers of certain raw materials to carry out due diligence in the supply chain. Due diligence regulations, such as the EU's Conflict Minerals Regulation, can legally oblige companies to take responsibility for certain risks in their supply chains. They can also require the importer to prove the regional origin of imported goods. The insights from those alternative traceability systems are transferred to products that might contain GMOs. When applied to the issue of GMOs, we propose reversing the burden of proof: All companies importing agricultural commodities must endeavour to identify risks of unauthorised GMOs (including NGTs) in their supply chain and, where appropriate, take measures to minimise the risk to raw material imports. The publication concludes that traceability is a means to an end and serves as a prerequisite for due diligence in order to minimise the risk of GMO contamination in supply chains. The exemplary transfer of due diligence to a company in the food industry illustrates the potential benefits of mandatory due diligence, particularly for stakeholders actively managing non-GMO supply chains.
欧盟针对转基因生物(GMO)的监管框架是为“传统”转基因GMO制定的,但所谓“新基因组技术(NGT)”的进步给检测和识别带来了实施挑战。由于可追溯性可以补充检测和识别策略,本研究对现有转基因生物可追溯性策略进行了改进研究。我们的结果基于对全球贸易农产品现有可追溯系统的全面分析,重点是大豆。还分析了其他部门的替代可追溯性策略。一个重点是针对那些没有分析验证方法的产品的可追溯性策略。例如欧盟进口的“冲突矿物”。所谓的欧盟冲突矿物法规要求某些原材料的进口商在供应链中进行尽职调查。尽职调查法规,如欧盟的冲突矿物法规,可以依法要求公司对其供应链中的某些风险负责。它们还可以要求进口商证明进口货物的地区来源。这些替代可追溯系统的见解被应用于可能含有转基因生物的产品。在应用于转基因生物问题时,我们建议颠倒举证责任:所有进口农产品的公司必须努力识别其供应链中未经授权的转基因生物(包括新基因组技术产品)的风险,并在适当情况下采取措施将原材料进口风险降至最低。该出版物得出结论,可追溯性是达到目的的一种手段,是尽职调查的先决条件,以便将供应链中转基因生物污染的风险降至最低。将尽职调查模式应用于食品行业的一家公司,说明了强制尽职调查的潜在好处,特别是对积极管理非转基因供应链的利益相关者而言。