Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 10;52(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01528-9.
The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety between single percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL) and antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPNL) for the treatment of staghorn calculi. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. A total of 160 eligible patients were included, with 81 in the sPNL group and 79 in the aPNL group. The study first compared the overall differences between sPNL and aPNL. Then, the patients were divided into two subgroups: Group 1 (with less than 5 stone branches) and Group 2 (with 5 or more stone branches), and the differences between the two subgroups were further analyzed. The results showed that aPNL had a higher stone-free rate (SFR) and required fewer percutaneous tracts, with a shorter operation time compared to sPNL (P < 0.05). Moreover, aPNL significantly reduced the need for staged surgery, particularly in patients with 5 or more stone branches. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the changes of hemoglobin levels and the need for blood transfusions between the sPNL and aPNL groups, and the incidence of multiple tracts was lower in the aPNL group. The two groups showed comparable rates of perioperative complications. We concluded that aPNL resulted in a higher SFR for staghorn calculi, and required fewer multiple percutaneous tracts, reduced the need for staged surgery, and had a shorter operative time than PNL alone, especially for patients with 5 or more stone branches. Furthermore, aPNL did not increase the incidence of surgical complications.
比较单纯经皮肾镜碎石术(sPNL)与逆行输尿管软镜辅助经皮肾镜碎石术(aPNL)治疗鹿角形结石的疗效和安全性。本研究在天津医科大学第二医院进行了前瞻性随机对照研究。共纳入 160 例符合条件的患者,其中 81 例接受 sPNL 治疗,79 例接受 aPNL 治疗。首先比较了 sPNL 和 aPNL 的总体差异。然后,将患者分为两组:第 1 组(结石分支少于 5 个)和第 2 组(结石分支 5 个或更多),进一步分析两组间的差异。结果显示,与 sPNL 相比,aPNL 具有更高的结石清除率(SFR)和更少的经皮通道,手术时间更短(P<0.05)。此外,aPNL 显著减少了分期手术的需求,尤其是在有 5 个或更多结石分支的患者中。此外,sPNL 和 aPNL 组血红蛋白水平变化和输血需求无显著差异,aPNL 组多发通道发生率较低。两组围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异。我们得出结论,与 sPNL 相比,aPNL 治疗鹿角形结石的 SFR 更高,需要的多通道更少,分期手术的需求减少,手术时间更短,尤其是对于有 5 个或更多结石分支的患者。此外,aPNL 不会增加手术并发症的发生率。