• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术后俯卧位输尿管支架取出线对患者生活质量及支架相关并发症的随机对照研究。

A randomized controlled study of ureteral stent extraction string on patient's quality of life and stent-related complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 28;51(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01451-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01451-5
PMID:37115264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10141830/
Abstract

To demonstrate the Tianjin Institute of Urology (TJIU) technique to place and remove the ureteral stent with extraction string after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Additionally, we aim to compare the pain experienced during stent removal, quality of life during stent retention, and stent-related complications between patients with and without extraction string. 65 patients were included in the final analysis in the string group constructed by the TJIU technique and 66 patients in the conventional double-J ureteral stent (non-string) group. All patients underwent the surgery in a prone position under general anesthesia. They completed the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) on postoperative days (POD) 7, as well as before their ureteral stent was removed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (0-10) was completed immediately after the removal of the ureteral stent. Moreover, a specialized person was responsible for recording stent-related complications. All patients completed the USSQ on POD 7, and we did not find a difference in scores in each field. However, there was a significant difference in the "sex" domain before removing the ureteral stent (4.34 vs 3.23; p = 0.01). Notably, the use of extraction string after PCNL could decrease the pain associated with stent removal significantly (mean VAS scores 1.45 vs 2.76; p < 0.01). Extraction string did not increase the incidence of stent-related complications. We concluded that placing a ureteral stent with an extraction string after PCNL reduces the pain of ureteral stent removal without increasing complications such as accidental removal of the stent, febrile urinary tract infection (UTI).

摘要

为了展示天津泌尿外科研究所(TJIU)经皮肾镜碎石取石术后(PCNL)使用取石线放置和取出输尿管支架的技术,我们还旨在比较有和没有取石线的患者在支架取出时的疼痛、支架留置期间的生活质量和支架相关并发症。TJIU 技术构建的带线组有 65 例患者,常规双 J 输尿管支架(无线)组有 66 例患者纳入最终分析。所有患者均在全身麻醉下俯卧位接受手术。他们在术后第 7 天(POD)和输尿管支架取出前完成了输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)。在取出输尿管支架后立即完成视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分(0-10)。此外,专人负责记录支架相关并发症。所有患者均在 POD7 完成 USSQ,我们未发现每个领域的评分存在差异。然而,在取出输尿管支架前“性别”域存在显著差异(4.34 比 3.23;p=0.01)。值得注意的是,PCNL 后使用取石线可显著减轻支架取出相关疼痛(平均 VAS 评分 1.45 比 2.76;p<0.01)。取石线并未增加支架相关并发症的发生率。我们得出结论,PCNL 后放置带取石线的输尿管支架可减轻输尿管支架取出的疼痛,而不会增加支架意外脱落、发热性尿路感染(UTI)等并发症的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/68621603759f/240_2023_1451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/ed6120a157e8/240_2023_1451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/ef72c82332bf/240_2023_1451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/68621603759f/240_2023_1451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/ed6120a157e8/240_2023_1451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/ef72c82332bf/240_2023_1451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/68621603759f/240_2023_1451_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled study of ureteral stent extraction string on patient's quality of life and stent-related complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position.经皮肾镜取石术后俯卧位输尿管支架取出线对患者生活质量及支架相关并发症的随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 28;51(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01451-5.
2
Pooled analysis of efficacy and safety of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出术的疗效和安全性的汇总分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017169.
3
Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出的再思考:患者的感受及偏好是什么?一项随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2015 Dec 9;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6.
4
Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: a cost-benefit analysis.在无并发症的输尿管镜检查后使用取出线取出输尿管支架:成本效益分析。
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):329-332. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4469.
5
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Nephrostomy Drainage vs Ureteral Stent Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using the Wisconsin StoneQOL.使用威斯康星州结石生活质量量表对经皮肾镜取石术后肾造瘘引流与输尿管支架置入进行的随机对照比较
J Endourol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1275-1284. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0235.
6
Ureteral stent extraction strings in children: Stratifying the risk of post operative urinary tract infection.儿童输尿管支架取出导丝:分析术后尿路感染的风险。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Oct;19(5):515.e1-515.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
7
Impact of ureteric stent removal by string on patient's quality of life and on complications at post-ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a controlled trial.经导丝输尿管支架取出术对输尿管镜碎石术后患者生活质量和并发症的影响:一项对照试验。
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):314-320. doi: 10.1111/bju.14622. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
The impact of ureteral stent type on patient symptoms as determined by the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.输尿管支架症状问卷确定的输尿管支架类型对患者症状的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
J Endourol. 2015 Mar;29(3):367-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0294. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
9
Efficacy of tamsulosin hydrochloride in relieving "double-J ureteral stent-related morbidity": a randomized placebo controlled clinical study.盐酸坦索罗辛缓解“双J输尿管支架相关并发症”的疗效:一项随机安慰剂对照临床研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2279-83. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0825-8. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Ureteral stent after PCNL: is leaving the threads through the percutaneous tract safe and better tolerated?经皮肾镜取石术后留置输尿管支架:经皮通道留置支架线是否安全且更耐受?
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 10;42(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04767-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life assessment following minimally invasive reconstructive surgery for benign ureteral strictures.良性输尿管狭窄微创重建术后的临床结局及健康相关生活质量评估
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 17;43(1):558. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05926-5.
2
Ureteral stents with extraction strings - a review on infection risk and prevention.带取出线的输尿管支架——感染风险与预防综述
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(1):94-99. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0222. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Evaluation of postoperative safety and comfort of ureteral stent removal with extraction string in modified split-leg prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经皮肾镜取石术中无管与肾造瘘管的并发症和结局:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):511-522. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
Case selection and implementation of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管经皮肾镜取石术的病例选择与实施
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Aug;10(8):3415-3422. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-559.
3
A randomized trial investigating clinical outcomes and stent-related symptoms after placement of a complete intra-ureteric stent on a string versus conventional stent placement.
改良分腿俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术中使用取石线取出输尿管支架的术后安全性及舒适度评估
BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 19;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01784-w.
4
Efficacy and safety of ketorolac and dexamethasone for preventing renal colic post stent removal: a randomized triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.酮咯酸与地塞米松预防支架取出后肾绞痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机三盲、安慰剂对照临床试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 11;87(2):565-570. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002934. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a prospective randomized controlled study.顺行软性输尿管镜辅助经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石: 一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 10;52(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01528-9.
一项关于在导丝上放置完整输尿管内支架与传统支架置入术后临床结局和支架相关症状的随机试验。
BJU Int. 2022 Mar;129(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/bju.15540. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
4
Current Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in China: A Spot Survey.中国经皮肾镜取石术的当前趋势:一项抽样调查。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jun 16;14:2507-2515. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S301484. eCollection 2021.
5
Urinary stone composition analysis and clinical characterization of 1520 patients in central China.华中地区 1520 例尿路结石患者的成分分析及临床特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85723-3.
6
European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.欧洲泌尿外科学会结石病学分会和国际尿石症联盟经皮肾镜取石术联合共识
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of minimal invasive exit strategies after percutaneous stone treatment.无管经皮肾镜取石术:经皮结石治疗后微创出口策略的评估。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Sep;30(5):679-683. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000802.
8
Postoperative Outcomes after Tubeless, Totally Tubeless, Standard, and Standard with Ureteral Stent Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Nationwide Retrospective Study in Japan.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后无管化、完全无管化、标准和标准置管输尿管支架:日本全国回顾性研究。
Urol Int. 2020;104(5-6):445-451. doi: 10.1159/000505103. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Changing Trends in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis in the Real World.真实世界中肾结石治疗方式的变化趋势。
J Endourol. 2019 Mar;33(3):248-253. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0667. Epub 2019 Feb 13.