Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术后俯卧位输尿管支架取出线对患者生活质量及支架相关并发症的随机对照研究。

A randomized controlled study of ureteral stent extraction string on patient's quality of life and stent-related complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 28;51(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01451-5.

Abstract

To demonstrate the Tianjin Institute of Urology (TJIU) technique to place and remove the ureteral stent with extraction string after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Additionally, we aim to compare the pain experienced during stent removal, quality of life during stent retention, and stent-related complications between patients with and without extraction string. 65 patients were included in the final analysis in the string group constructed by the TJIU technique and 66 patients in the conventional double-J ureteral stent (non-string) group. All patients underwent the surgery in a prone position under general anesthesia. They completed the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) on postoperative days (POD) 7, as well as before their ureteral stent was removed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (0-10) was completed immediately after the removal of the ureteral stent. Moreover, a specialized person was responsible for recording stent-related complications. All patients completed the USSQ on POD 7, and we did not find a difference in scores in each field. However, there was a significant difference in the "sex" domain before removing the ureteral stent (4.34 vs 3.23; p = 0.01). Notably, the use of extraction string after PCNL could decrease the pain associated with stent removal significantly (mean VAS scores 1.45 vs 2.76; p < 0.01). Extraction string did not increase the incidence of stent-related complications. We concluded that placing a ureteral stent with an extraction string after PCNL reduces the pain of ureteral stent removal without increasing complications such as accidental removal of the stent, febrile urinary tract infection (UTI).

摘要

为了展示天津泌尿外科研究所(TJIU)经皮肾镜碎石取石术后(PCNL)使用取石线放置和取出输尿管支架的技术,我们还旨在比较有和没有取石线的患者在支架取出时的疼痛、支架留置期间的生活质量和支架相关并发症。TJIU 技术构建的带线组有 65 例患者,常规双 J 输尿管支架(无线)组有 66 例患者纳入最终分析。所有患者均在全身麻醉下俯卧位接受手术。他们在术后第 7 天(POD)和输尿管支架取出前完成了输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)。在取出输尿管支架后立即完成视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分(0-10)。此外,专人负责记录支架相关并发症。所有患者均在 POD7 完成 USSQ,我们未发现每个领域的评分存在差异。然而,在取出输尿管支架前“性别”域存在显著差异(4.34 比 3.23;p=0.01)。值得注意的是,PCNL 后使用取石线可显著减轻支架取出相关疼痛(平均 VAS 评分 1.45 比 2.76;p<0.01)。取石线并未增加支架相关并发症的发生率。我们得出结论,PCNL 后放置带取石线的输尿管支架可减轻输尿管支架取出的疼痛,而不会增加支架意外脱落、发热性尿路感染(UTI)等并发症的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ca3/10147751/ed6120a157e8/240_2023_1451_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验