Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):817-825.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.12.019. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
To develop and test the direct and indirect associations between caregiver distress and its many contributing factors and covariates.
Analysis using data from a national, cross-sectional survey of Canadian caregivers.
A total of 6502 respondents of the 2012 General Social Survey-Caregiving and Care-receiving who self-identified as a caregiver.
We used exploratory structural equation modeling to achieve our aims. Based on literature review, we hypothesized a structural model of 5 caregiving factors that contribute to distress: caregiving burden, caregiving network and support, disruptions of family and social life, positive emotional experiences, and caregiving history. Survey items hypothesized to measure each latent factor were modeled using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). After establishing a well-fit EFA model, structural equation modeling was performed to examine the relationships between caregiving factors and caregiver distress while controlling for covariates such as caregiver's and care-recipient's sociodemographic characteristics and kinship.
EFA established a well-fit model that represented caregiver distress and its 5 contributing factors as hypothesized. Although all 5 had significant effects on caregiver distress, disruptions of family and social life contributed the most (β = 0.462), almost 3 times that of caregiving burden (β = 0.162). Positive emotional experiences also substantially reduced distress (β = -0.310).
Understanding the multifaceted nature of caregiver distress is crucial for developing effective strategies to support caregivers. In addition to reducing caregiving burden, having flexible resources and policies to minimize disruptions to caregivers' families (eg, flexible work policies; family-oriented education, training, and counseling) and enhance the positive aspects of caregiving may more effectively reduce distress.
探讨和检验照料者痛苦与其众多影响因素和协变量之间的直接和间接关联。
对加拿大照料者的全国性横断面调查数据进行分析。
2012 年一般社会调查-照顾和被照顾者中共有 6502 名自我认同为照料者的受访者。
我们使用探索性结构方程模型来实现我们的目标。基于文献回顾,我们假设了一个 5 个照料因素的结构模型,这些因素会导致痛苦:照料负担、照料网络和支持、家庭和社会生活的中断、积极的情感体验和照料史。假设用于测量每个潜在因素的调查项目通过探索性因素分析(EFA)进行建模。在建立了一个拟合良好的 EFA 模型后,进行结构方程建模,以检查照料因素与照料者痛苦之间的关系,同时控制照料者和被照料者的社会人口特征和亲属关系等协变量。
EFA 建立了一个拟合良好的模型,代表了我们假设的照料者痛苦及其 5 个影响因素。尽管所有 5 个因素对照料者痛苦都有显著影响,但家庭和社会生活的中断贡献最大(β=0.462),几乎是照料负担(β=0.162)的 3 倍。积极的情感体验也大大减轻了痛苦(β=-0.310)。
理解照料者痛苦的多方面性质对于制定支持照料者的有效策略至关重要。除了减轻照料负担外,还需要有灵活的资源和政策来最大程度地减少对照料者家庭的干扰(例如,灵活的工作政策;以家庭为导向的教育、培训和咨询),并增强照料的积极方面,这可能更有效地减轻痛苦。