Department of Public Health, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e081581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081581.
Due to substantial regional variability in available caregiving services and supports, culture and health status among informal caregivers in the USA, the study objective was to explore how rural-urban differences in aspects of caregiving-caregiving intensity, distance to care recipient, caregiver burden, caregiver health and caregiving support-vary by US Census region (Northeast, South, Midwest and West) after accounting for other social determinants of health.
This study was a secondary analysis of multiwave, cross-sectional study data.
The data were collected on a representative sample of informal, unpaid caregivers to older adults.
A sample of n=3551 informal caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving identified by older adult care recipients from waves 1 (2011) and 5 (2015) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Primary outcome measures were caregiving intensity (provided support for/with the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADL (IADLs)) caregiver assisted with, hours of caregiving per month), caregiver burden (physical, emotional and financial), support services sought (types and total number), caregivers' self-reported health and health status (individual comorbidities and a total number of comorbidities). Analyses were stratified by US Census region and rural-urban status, as defined by the US Census Bureau, of census tract of caregiver residence.
Urban caregivers provided higher levels of ADL support in the Northeast (beta=0.19, 95% CI 0.03, 0.35) and West (beta=0.15, 95% CI 0.05,0.26) regions. Urban caregivers provided significantly higher levels of ADL support (p=0.020), IADL support (p=0.033) and total ADLs plus IADLs (p=0.013) than rural caregivers. Caregivers living in the South had higher amounts of monthly hours spent caregiving, ADL support, IADL support and combined ADLs plus IADLs and were more likely to have obesity, report poor or fair health, have heart conditions and experience emotional difficulty from caregiving (all p<0.001).
Study findings underscore caregiving's multifaceted and complex nature and identify important urban-rural and regional differences in caregiving in the USA. Healthcare providers and healthcare organisations can have an important role in identifying and mitigating the negative impacts of caregiving on caregivers' overall health. Interventions and support should be tailored to caregivers' demographic backgrounds, addressing regional differences.
由于美国的护理服务和支持在可获得性方面存在显著的地区差异,以及非正式护理人员的文化和健康状况存在差异,因此本研究旨在探讨在考虑到其他健康决定因素后,护理强度、护理对象与护理人员之间的距离、护理人员负担、护理人员健康状况和护理支持等方面的城乡差异如何因美国人口普查区域(东北部、南部、中西部和西部)而有所不同。
这是一项对多波、横断面研究数据进行的二次分析。
数据来自全国老年人护理接受者识别的代表性非有偿、非正式护理人员样本,这些数据来自全国健康老龄化趋势研究的第 1 波(2011 年)和第 5 波(2015 年)。
本研究的参与者是来自全国护理研究的 n=3551 名非正式护理人员,这些护理人员是由全国健康老龄化趋势研究第 5 波(2015 年)中年龄较大的护理接受者识别的。
主要结果测量是护理强度(提供日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)的支持数量/支持的活动数量)、每月护理时间(小时))、护理人员负担(身体、情感和经济)、寻求的支持服务(类型和总数)、护理人员自我报告的健康状况和健康状况(个体合并症和合并症总数)。分析按美国人口普查区域和美国人口普查局定义的城乡状况进行分层,以护理人员居住地的普查区为依据。
东北部(β=0.19,95%置信区间 0.03,0.35)和西部(β=0.15,95%置信区间 0.05,0.26)地区的城市护理人员提供了更高水平的 ADL 支持。城市护理人员提供了显著更高水平的 ADL 支持(p=0.020)、IADL 支持(p=0.033)和 ADL 加 IADL 总数(p=0.013),高于农村护理人员。居住在南部的护理人员每月护理时间、ADL 支持、IADL 支持和 ADL 加 IADL 总数都较高,并且更有可能肥胖、报告健康状况不佳或一般、有心脏问题和经历情绪困难(所有 p<0.001)。
研究结果强调了护理的多方面和复杂性,并确定了美国护理在城乡和地区方面的重要差异。医疗保健提供者和医疗保健组织可以在确定和减轻护理对护理人员整体健康的负面影响方面发挥重要作用。干预措施和支持应根据护理人员的人口统计背景进行调整,以解决区域差异。