Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Centre for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 10;14(2):e078188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078188.
INTRODUCTION: Technology-based interventions have improved the social participation of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Nevertheless, how these interventions modify social participation remains to be seen, and what efficient behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have been used. As such, this study aims to conduct a scoping review, identifying the features and BCTs behind technology-based interventions that improve social participation for individuals with MCI or dementia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review method will be used to search journal articles from electronic databases, such as PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and reference lists. Following the population, concept and context structure, this study focuses on adults over 60 diagnosed with MCI or dementia. It delves into technology-based interventions, specifically focusing on BCTs, features and overall effectiveness for improving social participation. The research considers contextual factors, exploring the diverse settings where these interventions are used, including homes, healthcare facilities and community centres. This approach aims to provide nuanced insights into the impact of technology-based interventions on social participation in the targeted demographic. Two authors will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts using Covidence software. Disagreements will be resolved through consensus or a third reviewer, and reasons for exclusion will be documented. We will conduct a detailed analysis of BCTs to pinpoint effective strategies applicable to future technology-based intervention designs. Through this scoping review, we aim to provide valuable insights that guide the direction of future research. Specifically, we seek to inform the development of effective technology-based interventions tailored to support social participation for people with MCI or dementia. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary, as this review will use available articles from electronic databases. The outcome of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://osf.io/tkzuf/.
简介：基于技术的干预措施已经提高了轻度认知障碍（MCI）或痴呆症老年人的社会参与度。然而，这些干预措施如何改变社会参与度仍有待观察，以及使用了哪些有效的行为改变技术（BCT）。因此，本研究旨在进行范围综述，确定提高 MCI 或痴呆症个体社会参与度的基于技术的干预措施的特点和 BCT。
方法和分析：将使用范围综述方法从电子数据库（如 PsycINFO、PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus 和参考文献列表）中搜索期刊文章。本研究根据人群、概念和背景结构，重点关注 60 岁以上被诊断为 MCI 或痴呆症的成年人。它深入研究了基于技术的干预措施，特别是专注于 BCT、特点和整体有效性，以提高社会参与度。该研究考虑了背景因素，探讨了这些干预措施在不同环境中的使用情况，包括家庭、医疗保健设施和社区中心。这种方法旨在提供有关基于技术的干预措施对目标人群社会参与影响的细致见解。两名作者将使用 Covidence 软件独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。分歧将通过协商或第三名评审员解决，并记录排除的原因。我们将对 BCT 进行详细分析，以确定适用于未来基于技术的干预设计的有效策略。通过本次范围综述，我们旨在提供有价值的见解，指导未来研究的方向。具体而言，我们旨在为开发针对 MCI 或痴呆症患者的有效基于技术的干预措施提供信息，以支持他们的社会参与。
伦理和传播：由于本综述将使用电子数据库中可用的文章，因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上。
协议注册编号：https://osf.io/tkzuf/。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Nat Aging. 2023-5
JBI Evid Synth. 2023-3-1
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-3-22
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022-11
BMC Public Health. 2021-8-17
Zotero 插件