Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 May;35(5):722-730.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
To investigate if combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and yttrium-90 (Y) radioembolization results in superior outcomes than those yielded by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and Y for the treatment of intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
A retrospective review of patients presented at an institutional multidisciplinary liver tumor board between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2023 was conducted. In total, 44 patients with HCC who underwent Y 4 weeks within initiation of ICI or TKI therapy were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to account for baseline demographic differences. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and univariate statistics identified disease response and control rate differences. Duration of imaging response was defined as number of months between the first scan after therapy and the first scan showing progression as defined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) or immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). Adverse events were analyzed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Patients in the Y+ICI therapy group had better objective response rates (ORRs) (89.5% vs 36.8%; P < .001) and disease control rates (DCRs) (94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001) by mRECIST and iRECIST (ORR: 78.9% vs 36.8%; P < .001; DCR: 94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001). Median PFS (8.3 vs 4.1 months; P = .37) and OS (15.8 vs 14.3 months; P = .52) were not statistically different. Twelve patients (63.1%) in the Y+TKI group did not complete systemic therapy owing to adverse effects compared with 1 patient (5.3%) in the Y+ICI group (P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events were not statistically different (Y+TKI: 21.1%; Y+ICI: 5.3%; P = .150).
Patients with HCC who received Y+ICI had better imaging response and fewer regimen-altering adverse events than those who received Y+TKI. No significant combination therapy adverse events were attributable to radioembolization.
研究免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合钇-90(Y)放射栓塞治疗与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合 Y 治疗中晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效,以确定联合治疗是否优于单一疗法。
对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 1 日在机构多学科肝脏肿瘤委员会就诊的患者进行回顾性研究。共纳入 44 例 HCC 患者,这些患者在开始接受 ICI 或 TKI 治疗的 4 周内接受了 Y 治疗。采用倾向评分匹配法来校正基线人口统计学差异。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并采用单因素统计学分析确定疾病缓解率和控制率的差异。影像学缓解持续时间定义为从治疗后首次扫描到根据改良实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)或免疫实体瘤反应评估标准(iRECIST)首次扫描显示进展之间的月数。采用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第 5.0 版分析不良事件。
Y+ICI 治疗组的客观缓解率(ORR)(89.5% vs 36.8%;P <.001)和疾病控制率(DCR)(94.7% vs 63.2%;P <.001)均优于 Y+TKI 治疗组(mRECIST 和 iRECIST 标准下的 ORR:78.9% vs 36.8%;P <.001;DCR:94.7% vs 63.2%;P <.001)。中位 PFS(8.3 个月 vs 4.1 个月;P =.37)和 OS(15.8 个月 vs 14.3 个月;P =.52)无统计学差异。Y+TKI 组有 12 例(63.1%)患者因不良反应未能完成系统治疗,而 Y+ICI 组仅 1 例(5.3%)(P <.001)。3/4 级不良事件无统计学差异(Y+TKI:21.1%;Y+ICI:5.3%;P =.150)。
与 Y+TKI 治疗相比,接受 Y+ICI 治疗的 HCC 患者具有更好的影像学反应和更少的治疗方案改变的不良反应。没有因放射栓塞而导致的联合治疗相关不良反应。