Director, Hampton Roads Center for Dermatology, Newport News, Virginia; President, Skin of Color Society, Newport News, Virginia.
Clinical Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Dec;91(6):1189-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.067. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
Skin color classification can have importance in skin health, pigmentary disorders, and oncologic condition assessments. It is also critical for evaluating disease course and response to a variety of therapeutic interventions and aids in accurate classification of participants in clinical research studies. A panel of dermatologists conducted a literature review to assess the strengths and limitations of existing classification scales, as well as to compare their preferences and utilities. We identified 17 skin classification systems utilized in dermatologic settings. These systems include a range of parameters such as UV light reactivity, race, ethnicity, and degree of pigmentation. The Fitzpatrick skin type classification is most widely used and validated. However it has numerous limitations including its conflation with race, ethnicity, and skin color. There is a lack of validation data available for the remaining scales. There are significant deficiencies in current skin classification instruments. Consensus-based initiatives to drive the development of validated and reliable tools are critically needed.
肤色分类在皮肤健康、色素障碍和肿瘤状况评估中具有重要意义。它对于评估疾病过程和对各种治疗干预的反应也很关键,并有助于准确分类临床研究参与者。一组皮肤科医生进行了文献回顾,以评估现有分类量表的优缺点,并比较他们的偏好和效用。我们确定了 17 种在皮肤科环境中使用的皮肤分类系统。这些系统包括紫外线反应性、种族、民族和色素沉着程度等一系列参数。Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型分类应用最广泛,也得到了充分验证。然而,它存在许多局限性,包括与种族、民族和肤色的混淆。其余量表的验证数据不足。目前的皮肤分类工具存在明显缺陷。迫切需要基于共识的倡议来推动经过验证和可靠工具的开发。