Master in Clinical Exercise Physiology, School of Kinesiology, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Metropolitana, Chile.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Maule, Chile.
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 6;12:e16880. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16880. eCollection 2024.
Low physical activity (PA) levels and low physical fitness (PF) have been reported in subjects with temporality-based chronic pain; however, it is unknown whether there are differences in subjects with nociplastic pain (NP) compared with subjects with non-nociplastic pain (NNP).
The aim was to compare the levels of PA and PF in patients with chronic, nociplastic, and non-nociplastic musculoskeletal pain.
This is an analytical, cross-sectional study. The sample comprised 30 patients receiving ambulatory physiotherapy treatment. Pain was classified as NP or NNP according to the International Association for the Study of Pain categorization system. The PA level was measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, and the PF level was measured with the hand grip strength test (HGS) to assess upper limb strength, the five Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test (5R-SRTS) to assess lower limb strength and power, and the YMCA 3 Min Step Test (YMCA-3MST) to estimate peak VO. The results were compared with independent samples t-tests (with < 0.05 considered significant). Cohen's d was calculated to determine the effect size.
The NP group reported a significantly lower PA level than the NNP group, specifically the vigorous PA ( = 0.0009), moderate PA ( = 0.0002), and total PA ( = 0.005) dimensions. The NP group also showed significantly lower 5R-STS ( = 0.000) and HGS ( = 0.002) results compared with the NNP group. There were no significant differences in the YMCA-3MST between the NP and NNP groups ( = 0.635).
It is possible that the neurophysiological and neuromuscular changes related to NP are associated with a reduced ability to perform vigorous PA. Clinicians should identify the presence of NP comorbidities in conjunction with the diagnosis when establishing the therapeutic goals.
有研究报道, temporality-based 慢性疼痛患者的体力活动(PA)水平和身体机能(PF)较低;然而,尚不清楚神经病理性疼痛(NP)患者与非神经病理性疼痛(NNP)患者之间是否存在差异。
比较慢性神经病理性和非神经病理性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的 PA 和 PF 水平。
这是一项分析性、横断面研究。样本包括 30 名接受门诊物理治疗的患者。疼痛根据国际疼痛研究协会的分类系统分为 NP 或 NNP。PA 水平通过国际体力活动问卷-短表(International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form)进行测量,PF 水平通过握力测试(hand grip strength test,HGS)评估上肢力量、五次重复坐站测试(five repetition sit-to-stand test,5R-SRTS)评估下肢力量和功率,以及 YMCA 3 分钟台阶测试(YMCA 3 Min Step Test,YMCA-3MST)评估峰值 VO。采用独立样本 t 检验( < 0.05 为差异有统计学意义)比较结果,并用 Cohen's d 计算效应量。
NP 组报告的 PA 水平明显低于 NNP 组,尤其是剧烈 PA( = 0.0009)、中度 PA( = 0.0002)和总 PA( = 0.005)维度。NP 组的 5R-STS( = 0.000)和 HGS( = 0.002)结果也明显低于 NNP 组。NP 组和 NNP 组的 YMCA-3MST 差异无统计学意义( = 0.635)。
NP 相关的神经生理和神经肌肉变化可能与剧烈 PA 能力下降有关。临床医生在制定治疗目标时,应在诊断的同时确定 NP 合并症的存在。