Implant removal: benefits and drawbacks - Results of a survey with five hundred participants from the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) and comparison with other international trends.

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of videogames and augmented reality technology, injuries associated with e sports have garnered increased attention from researchers and healthcare professionals. This review articles examines the spectrum of injuries associated with videogames and augmented reality and describes the nuances of the diagnoses associated with gaming injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online-based questionnaire of 25 items was distributed to all the members of the Italian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SIOT) regarding their indications, usual practices, and complications encountered with hardware removal in upper and lower limbs. The survey was open from July 2024 to October 2024. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied.

RESULTS

Five hundred answers were received. While implant removal is primarily achieved in symptomatic patients, in the case of asymptomatic patients, it is not routinely performed, with a slightly higher tendency of removal in those aged 16-40 years old. These tendencies were registered both for the upper and lower limbs, with more reticence in hardware removal in the upper limbs. 96% of respondents declared the lack of hospital guidelines regarding this kind of surgery. The most feared intraoperative complications during the removal concerned screw stripping and implant breakage, with only 0.6% of respondents reporting no intraoperative difficulties. While patient discomfort and avoidance of future complications were the main indications for removal, postoperative complications occurred as wound scarring concerns, persistence of symptoms and bleeding. Despite not being considered a "procedure for the resident", when residents were specifically questioned, in 76% of cases they felt self-confident ≥ 7 on a scale from 1 to 10. Lastly, according to 62% of the respondents, titanium implants are more difficult to remove than stainless steel ones.

CONCLUSION

This survey describes a general tendency to not routinely remove implants, even in younger patients in the lower and especially upper limbs, unless in case of symptoms. Hardware removal could evolve from a simple procedure into a more complex surgery due to intraoperative technical difficulties. A lack of universal policy and guidelines exists throughout the Italian territory.