BIOETHICS Research Group - Department of Philosophy, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2024 Feb 12;46(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s40656-024-00610-0.
This paper addresses the topic of determinism in contemporary microbiome research. I distinguish two types of deterministic claims about the microbiome, and I show evidence that both types of claims are present in the contemporary literature. First, the idea that the host genetics determines the composition of the microbiome which I call "host-microbiome determinism". Second, the idea that the genetics of the holobiont (the individual unit composed by a host plus its microbiome) determines the expression of certain phenotypic traits, which I call "microbiome-phenotype determinism". Drawing on the stability of traits conception of individuality (Suárez in Hist Philos Life Sci 42:11, 2020) I argue that none of these deterministic hypotheses is grounded on our current knowledge of how the holobiont is transgenerationally assembled, nor how it expresses its phenotypic traits.
本文探讨了当代微生物组研究中的决定论问题。我区分了两种关于微生物组的决定论观点,并展示了当代文献中存在这两种观点的证据。首先,宿主遗传学决定微生物组组成的观点,我称之为“宿主-微生物组决定论”。其次,整个生物体(由宿主及其微生物组组成的个体单位)的遗传学决定某些表型特征表达的观点,我称之为“微生物组-表型决定论”。借鉴个体特质稳定性概念(Suárez 在 Hist Philos Life Sci 42:11, 2020),我认为这些决定论假设都没有基于我们当前对生物体如何进行跨代组装以及如何表达其表型特征的了解。