• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Single Center Experience from Romania.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后左心室质量回归的比较分析——罗马尼亚单中心经验
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):555-562. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.555.
2
Study protocol for an internahaational prospective non-randomised trial evaluating the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic-valve stenosis in patients at risk to severe valve obstruction: the TAVISAR trial.一项国际前瞻性非随机试验的研究方案,该试验旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗有严重瓣膜狭窄风险的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期疗效:TAVISAR试验
BMJ Open. 2025 May 24;15(5):e101417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101417.
3
Operation in the gray zone: is SAVR still useful in patients aged between 75 and 80 years?灰色地带的手术:75至80岁患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术是否仍有价值?
Future Cardiol. 2024 Dec-Dec;20(15-16):849-858. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2433827. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
5
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Approach for the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管与外科手术治疗合并冠状动脉疾病的主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价与荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31697.
6
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN 3 versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality: a cost-utility analysis for Switzerland.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(SAPIEN 3)与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低外科死亡率手术风险的有症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:瑞士的成本-效用分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Oct 24;154:3558. doi: 10.57187/s.3558.
8
[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review of the literature on efficacy and safety data].经导管主动脉瓣植入术:关于疗效和安全性数据的文献系统评价
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Jan;107(1):25-38. doi: 10.1701/2132.23102.
9
Prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术后左心室逆向重构的预后影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12483-9.
10
Evaluating long-term outcomes and the impact of small aortic annulus on valve replacement-a novel systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgery vs. transcatheter interventions.评估小主动脉瓣环对瓣膜置换的长期预后及影响——一项比较手术与经导管介入治疗的新型系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 26;12:1555853. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555853. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Interaction between sex and left ventricular reverse remodeling and its association with outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.性别与左心室逆重构的相互作用及其与经导管主动脉瓣植入术后结局的关系。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Sep;38(9):1973-1985. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02596-x. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Extent of Left Ventricular Mass Regression and Impact of Global Left Ventricular Afterload on Cardiac Events and Mortality after Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后左心室质量消退程度及整体左心室后负荷对心脏事件和死亡率的影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 16;11(24):7482. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247482.
3
Prognosis of Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Severe, Non-critical Form, With Surgical Treatment Benefits.矛盾性低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的预后:一种严重的、非临界形式,具有手术治疗益处。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;9:852954. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.852954. eCollection 2022.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
5
Sex differences in left ventricular remodelling in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室重构的性别差异。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):781-789. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab174.
6
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
7
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter Following Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后心房颤动或房扑:PARTNER 3 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 26;14(14):1565-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.026.
8
Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.改善外科和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室重构和临床结局的挑战和机遇。
Front Med. 2021 Jun;15(3):416-437. doi: 10.1007/s11684-021-0852-7. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Regression of Left Ventricular Mass After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室质量的消退:PARTNER 试验和注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 19;75(19):2446-2458. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.042.
10
Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography.成人经胸超声心动图全面检查操作指南:美国超声心动图学会的建议
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jan;32(1):1-64. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后左心室质量回归的比较分析——罗马尼亚单中心经验

Comparative Analysis of Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Single Center Experience from Romania.

作者信息

Tarus Andrei, Paius Cristian-Traian, Bacusca Alberto-Emanuel, Benchea Laura, Stoleriu Silviu-Paul, Ungurianu Adi-Petrisor, Enache Mihail, Tinica Grigore

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Iasi, Romania.

"Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):555-562. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.555.

DOI:10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.555
PMID:38348071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859189/
Abstract

Severe aortic stenosis is often associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Elevated left ventricular mass (LVM) is linked to higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the standard treatment, but transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers an alternative for high-risk surgical patients. Understanding how these interventions affect left ventricular mass regression is crucial. This retrospective study analyzed 315 patients treated between December 2014 and December 2022, categorizing them into surgical and transcatheter treatment groups. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and six-month follow-up. Statistical analysis assessed differences between groups and predictors of LV mass reduction. The overall dataset indicated an average percentage reduction in LVM of 10.86%±29.41%. Segmenting the data, the TAVI subgroup exhibited a reduction of 4.28%±30.31%, while the SAVR subgroup highlighted a pronounced decline of 17.92%±26.76%. Preoperative LVMi and mean pressure gradient positively correlated with LVM reduction, while TAVI negatively impacted it. Both TAVI and SAVR interventions yield benefits in reducing left ventricular mass, with SAVR showing a superior outcome. Recognizing predictors of LV mass regression is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies, and early valve replacement should be considered to prevent irreversible LV hypertrophy.

摘要

重度主动脉瓣狭窄常与左心室肥厚(LVH)相关。左心室质量(LVM)升高与较高的心血管发病率和死亡率相关。传统上,外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)一直是标准治疗方法,但经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)为高风险手术患者提供了一种替代方案。了解这些干预措施如何影响左心室质量消退至关重要。这项回顾性研究分析了2014年12月至2022年12月期间接受治疗的315例患者,将他们分为外科治疗组和经导管治疗组。在基线和六个月随访时收集临床和超声心动图数据。统计分析评估了组间差异和左心室质量降低的预测因素。总体数据集显示LVM平均降低百分比为10.86%±29.41%。对数据进行细分,TAVI亚组降低了4.28%±30.31%,而SAVR亚组显著降低了17.92%±26.76%。术前LVMi和平均压力阶差与LVM降低呈正相关,而TAVI对其有负面影响。TAVI和SAVR干预措施在降低左心室质量方面均有益处,SAVR显示出更好的结果。认识到左心室质量消退的预测因素对于优化治疗策略至关重要,应考虑早期瓣膜置换以预防不可逆的左心室肥厚。