Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Libertyville, IL, USA.
Arthrex, Inc, Naples, FL, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2024 May;45(5):535-541. doi: 10.1177/10711007241227948. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
Although double-row suture-anchored (DRSA) techniques for Achilles insertional tendinosis has proven successful, a reoccurring failure mode not yet addressed is suture tearing through the tendon. This study aims to address suture tearing by incorporating a rip-stop element. Authors hypothesized that the Rip-Stop group would demonstrate increased strength compared with more traditional techniques.
12 paired cadaveric feet were used in this study (n = 24). One sample from each pair was assigned to receive the standard double-row (SDR) Achilles repair with 4.75-mm knotless anchors (n = 12). The control's matched sides were divided between 2 DRSA bridge groups: modified double-row (MDR) bridge with 3.9-mm anchors or rip-stop double-row (RS-DR) bridge repair with soft proximal anchors and 3.9-mm anchored distal row. In neutral position, specimens underwent 1000 cycles (20-100 N) followed by load to failure. Displacements, stiffness, ultimate load, and failure mode were recorded.
RS-DR had the lowest initial displacement values followed by SDR and MDR (1.3 ± 0.4, 2.7 ± 1.4, and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm, respectively). Significance was detected when comparing initial displacement of RS-DR to MDR ( = .038). Cyclic displacement was lowest for RS-DR, followed by MDR and SDR (1.6 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 1.1, and 4.5 ± 3.2 mm, respectively). Cyclic stiffness was similar for RS-DR and MDR (89.1 ± 24.6 and 81.9 ± 5.6 N/mm, respectively). RS-DR ultimate load (1116.8 ± 405.7 N) was statistically greater than SDR (465.6 ± 352.7, = .003).
RS-DR-repaired specimens demonstrated a decrease in displacement values and increased ultimate load and stiffness when compared to other groups. Results of this cadaveric model suggest that the addition of a rip-stop to DRSA Achilles repair is more impactful than anchor size. Limitations include that this was a time-zero biomechanical study, which cannot simulate the performance of the repairs during postoperative healing and recovery.
A rip-stop technique for Achilles repair effectively improves dynamic mechanical characteristics and may mitigate suture tearing through tendon in a patient cohort.
尽管双排缝线锚定(DRSA)技术治疗跟腱插入部病变已被证明是成功的,但尚未解决的一个复发失败模式是缝线撕裂穿过肌腱。本研究旨在通过加入防撕裂元件来解决缝线撕裂问题。作者假设 Rip-Stop 组将表现出比更传统技术更高的强度。
本研究使用了 12 对尸体足(n=24)。每对中的一个样本被分配接受标准双排(SDR)跟腱修复术,使用 4.75mm 无结锚(n=12)。对照组的匹配侧分为两组 DRSA 桥接组:改良双排(MDR)桥接使用 3.9mm 锚钉或防撕裂双排(RS-DR)桥接修复使用近端软锚钉和 3.9mm 固定的远端排。在中立位置,标本进行了 1000 次循环(20-100N),然后进行失效负载测试。记录位移、刚度、极限载荷和失效模式。
RS-DR 的初始位移值最低,其次是 SDR 和 MDR(分别为 1.3±0.4、2.7±1.4 和 3.2±1.3mm)。RS-DR 与 MDR 的初始位移比较有统计学意义( = .038)。RS-DR 的循环位移最低,其次是 MDR 和 SDR(分别为 1.6±0.9、2.2±1.1 和 4.5±3.2mm)。RS-DR 和 MDR 的循环刚度相似(分别为 89.1±24.6 和 81.9±5.6N/mm)。RS-DR 的极限载荷(1116.8±405.7N)明显大于 SDR(465.6±352.7, = .003)。
与其他组相比,RS-DR 修复的标本表现出位移值降低、极限载荷和刚度增加。该尸体模型的结果表明,在 DRSA 跟腱修复中加入防撕裂元件比锚钉尺寸更具影响力。局限性包括这是一个零时间的生物力学研究,无法模拟术后愈合和恢复过程中修复的性能。
防撕裂技术有效改善了跟腱修复的动态力学特性,可能减轻患者肌腱中的缝线撕裂。