Zacarías I, Yáñez E, Araya E, Ballester D
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1985 Mar;35(1):119-29.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of incorporating sweet lupine flour (SLF) to bread, upon the organoleptic characteristics and acceptability of the product. The substitution levels were 3, 6, 9 and 12%. The sensory evaluation test was done by 25 trained judges using the hedonic scaling method (9 to 1 scoring). Internal and external characteristics of appearance, color, aroma, texture, bitterness and flavor, as well as general acceptability, were measured. Sensory evaluation results of the external characteristics were significant at the 9 and 12% SLF levels for color (p less than 0.05) while the other parameters did not show significant differences. In regard to the internal characteristics, a significant difference for color was found at the 3% level of SLF (p less than 0.05); and at 6, 9 and 12% SLF levels, for appearance (p less than 0.05). The general acceptability was good at all the levels tested, with no significant differences among them. An acceptability study at the consumer level for 9% lupine flour bread was carried out in a group of 90 girls, aged 10-12 years, during a 10-day period. The results showed a very good acceptability of the product (p less than 0.01). The results of this study indicate that the incorporation of 6% SLF to the bread, did not affect adversely its sensory properties. Moreover, the acceptability of bread containing up to 12% SLF was excellent.
本研究的目的是确定在面包中添加甜羽扇豆粉(SLF)对产品感官特性和可接受性的影响。替代水平分别为3%、6%、9%和12%。由25名经过培训的评委采用享乐评分法(9至1分)进行感官评价测试。测量了外观、颜色、香气、质地、苦味和风味等内部和外部特征,以及总体可接受性。外部特征的感官评价结果显示,在SLF含量为9%和12%时,颜色有显著差异(p小于0.05),而其他参数没有显著差异。关于内部特征,在SLF含量为3%时,颜色有显著差异(p小于0.05);在SLF含量为6%、9%和12%时,外观有显著差异(p小于0.05)。在所有测试水平下,总体可接受性都很好,它们之间没有显著差异。对一组90名年龄在10至12岁的女孩进行了为期10天的9%羽扇豆粉面包消费者层面的可接受性研究。结果显示该产品的可接受性非常好(p小于0.01)。本研究结果表明,在面包中添加6%的SLF不会对其感官特性产生不利影响。此外,SLF含量高达12%的面包的可接受性极佳。