Department of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, Japan.
Department of Medical Spectroscopy, Institute for Medical Photonics Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0298132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298132. eCollection 2024.
Measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) using the autofluorescence spectroscopy yield underestimations of actual values in eyes with cataracts. Previously, we proposed a correction method for this error using deep learning (DL); however, the correction performance was validated through internal cross-validation. This cross-sectional study aimed to validate this approach using an external validation dataset.
MPODs at 0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2° eccentricities and macular pigment optical volume (MPOV) within 9° eccentricity were measured using SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 197 (training dataset inherited from our previous study) and 157 eyes (validating dataset) before and after cataract surgery. A DL model was trained to predict the corrected value from the pre-operative value using the training dataset, and we measured the discrepancy between the corrected value and the actual postoperative value. Subsequently, the prediction performance was validated using a validation dataset.
Using the validation dataset, the mean absolute values of errors for MPOD and MPOV corrected using DL ranged from 8.2 to 12.4%, which were lower than values with no correction (P < 0.001, linear mixed model with Tukey's test). The error depended on the autofluorescence image quality used to calculate MPOD. The mean errors in high and moderate quality images ranged from 6.0 to 11.4%, which were lower than those of poor quality images.
The usefulness of the DL correction method was validated. Deep learning reduced the error for a relatively good autofluorescence image quality. Poor-quality images were not corrected.
使用自发荧光光谱法测量黄斑色素光学密度(MPOD)会导致白内障眼中实际值的低估。此前,我们提出了一种使用深度学习(DL)纠正此错误的方法;然而,该方法的校正性能是通过内部交叉验证验证的。本横断面研究旨在使用外部验证数据集来验证这种方法。
使用 SPECTRALIS(德国海德堡工程公司)在 197 只眼(继承自我们之前研究的训练数据集)和 157 只眼(验证数据集)术前和术后白内障手术前测量 0.25°、0.5°、1°和 2°偏心处的 MPOD 和 9°偏心处的黄斑色素光体积(MPOV)。使用训练数据集通过 DL 模型从术前值预测校正值,并测量校正值与实际术后值之间的差异。随后,使用验证数据集验证预测性能。
使用验证数据集,使用 DL 校正的 MPOD 和 MPOV 的平均绝对误差值范围为 8.2%至 12.4%,低于无校正值(P<0.001,Tukey 检验的线性混合模型)。误差取决于用于计算 MPOD 的自发荧光图像质量。高质量和中等质量图像的平均误差范围为 6.0%至 11.4%,低于低质量图像。
DL 校正方法的有效性得到了验证。深度学习降低了相对较好的自发荧光图像质量的误差。低质量图像未得到校正。