• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中学生在皮亚杰式投射和欧几里得空间任务中的表现。

Secondary students' performance on Piagetian projective and Euclidean spatial tasks.

作者信息

Reesink C J

出版信息

J Genet Psychol. 1985 Dec;146(4):439-47. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1985.10532462.

DOI:10.1080/00221325.1985.10532462
PMID:3835228
Abstract

Four tasks involving Piaget's Euclidean and projective space were administered to a total of 99 students in Grades 8, 10, and 12: Task 1, Volumes of Revolution; Task 2, Geometric Sections; Task 3, Folding Patterns; and Task 4, Projection of Shadows. A scalogram analysis indicated that the tasks scaled in increasing order of difficulty in the following order: Task 1, Task 4, Task 2, and Task 3. These results did not support Piaget's position that projective and Euclidean concepts develop concurrently. Also, significant differences between task performance with regard to gender were found for Tasks 3 and 4. Significant differences between task performance and grade level for Tasks 1 and 4 were found. Standardized achievement test performance and task performance relationships were significant in 3 of the 16 analyses.

摘要

我们对99名八年级、十年级和十二年级的学生进行了四项涉及皮亚杰的欧几里得空间和射影空间的任务:任务1,旋转体体积;任务2,几何截面;任务3,折叠图案;任务4,阴影投射。量表分析表明,这些任务的难度按以下顺序递增:任务1、任务4、任务2和任务3。这些结果并不支持皮亚杰关于射影概念和欧几里得概念同时发展的观点。此外,在任务3和任务4中,发现了任务表现方面的性别显著差异。在任务1和任务4中,发现了任务表现与年级水平之间的显著差异。在16项分析中的3项中,标准化成就测试表现与任务表现之间的关系显著。

相似文献

1
Secondary students' performance on Piagetian projective and Euclidean spatial tasks.中学生在皮亚杰式投射和欧几里得空间任务中的表现。
J Genet Psychol. 1985 Dec;146(4):439-47. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1985.10532462.
2
A longitudinal study of the development of spatial conceptual ability.一项关于空间概念能力发展的纵向研究。
J Genet Psychol. 1987 Mar;148(1):71-8. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1987.9914538.
3
Gender differences in patterns of spatial ability, environmental cognition, and math and English achievement in late adolescence.青春期后期空间能力、环境认知以及数学和英语成绩模式中的性别差异。
Adolescence. 1989 Summer;24(94):421-31.
4
Relationships among gender, cognitive style, academic major, and performance on the Piaget water-level task.性别、认知风格、学术专业与皮亚杰水位任务表现之间的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Jun;80(3 Pt 1):771-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.80.3.771.
5
Relationships among different stages of Piagetian tasks and spatial relations in adolescents.青少年皮亚杰任务不同阶段与空间关系之间的联系。
J Genet Psychol. 1979 Jun;134(2d Half):179-84. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1979.10534052.
6
The differential salience of spatial information features in the geometric reproductions of young children.幼儿几何图形再现中空间信息特征的差异显著性
J Genet Psychol. 1986 Dec;147(4):447-55. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1986.9914521.
7
The relationships of spatial ability and sex to formal reasoning capabilities.
J Psychol. 1980 Mar;104(2d Half):191-8.
8
Solution strategies as possible explanations of individual and sex differences in a dynamic spatial task.作为动态空间任务中个体差异和性别差异可能解释的解决策略。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 May;128(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
9
Spatial task performance, sex differences, and motion sickness susceptibility.空间任务表现、性别差异与晕动病易感性。
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Oct;95(2):425-31. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.425.
10
Spatial conceptions in Chinese and Canadian children.中国和加拿大儿童的空间概念
J Genet Psychol. 1986 Dec;147(4):457-64. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1986.9914522.