• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool.《重症监护疼痛观察工具》印尼语版本的跨文化适应与验证
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Jan 1;11(1):113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Validating a pain assessment tool in heterogeneous ICU patients: Is it possible?在异质性重症监护病房患者中验证一种疼痛评估工具:这可行吗?
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 Jan;25(1):8-15. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12469. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Validation of a Chinese version critical-care pain observation tool in nonintubated and intubated critically ill patients: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版重症监护疼痛观察工具在非插管和插管危重症患者中的验证:两项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(15-16):2824-2832. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14862. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Validation of the Danish version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool.《重症监护疼痛观察工具》丹麦语版本的验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Oct;60(9):1314-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12770. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
Reliability of three linguistically and culturally validated pain assessment tools for sedated ICU patients by ICU nurses in Finland.芬兰重症监护病房护士使用的三种经过语言和文化验证的疼痛评估工具对镇静重症监护病房患者的可靠性。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Apr 25;18(2):165-173. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0139.
6
The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults : A prospective validation study.用于危重症成人的重症监护疼痛观察工具德文版:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Anaesthesist. 2019 Dec;68(12):836-842. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool.欧洲葡萄牙语重症监护疼痛观察工具的验证测试
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;10(6):1075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061075.
8
Pain assessment using the critical-care pain observation tool in Chinese critically ill ventilated adults.在中国接受机械通气的成年危重症患者中使用重症监护疼痛观察工具进行疼痛评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Nov;48(5):975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool.重症监护疼痛观察工具荷兰语版本的验证。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 May;24(3):132-140. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12225. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
10
Validation of Two Pain Assessment Tools Using a Standardized Nociceptive Stimulation in Critically Ill Adults.重症成人使用标准化伤害性刺激验证两种疼痛评估工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.014.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)在接受骨科手术的儿科患者中的验证。
Can J Pain. 2023 Feb 17;7(1):2156332. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2156332. eCollection 2023.
2
Diagnostic Values of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and the Behavioral Pain Scale for Pain Assessment among Unconscious Patients: A Comparative Study.重症监护疼痛观察工具和行为疼痛量表在昏迷患者疼痛评估中的诊断价值:一项比较研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):472-476. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24154.
3
2021 KSCCM clinical practice guidelines for pain, agitation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disturbance in the intensive care unit.2021年美国危重病医学会重症监护病房疼痛、躁动、谵妄、活动受限及睡眠障碍临床实践指南。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Feb;37(1):1-25. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00094. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Comparison of two behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain: A systematic review.两种行为疼痛量表评估操作痛的比较:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2050-2060. doi: 10.1002/nop2.714. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
Current Perspectives on the Assessment and Management of Pain in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房疼痛评估与管理的当前观点
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 14;14:1733-1744. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256406. eCollection 2021.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the the patient decision aid "Making Choices: Feeding Options for Patients with Dementia" to Brazilian Portuguese language.跨文化调适与患者决策辅助工具《选择:痴呆患者的喂养选择》巴西葡萄牙语版本的内容效度。
Codas. 2021 Jun 4;33(3):e20200044. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192020044. eCollection 2021.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) among Medical Students in Malaysia.马来版本沟通技巧态度量表(CSAS)在马来西亚医学生中的跨文化调适及心理计量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 5;18(7):3778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073778.
8
Evaluation of Nociception Using Quantitative Pupillometry and Skin Conductance in Critically Ill Unconscious Patients: A Pilot Study.使用定量瞳孔测量法和皮肤电导率评估重症昏迷患者的伤害感受:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):109. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010109.
9
Understanding Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain Assessment in Dementia: A Literature Review.了解护士对痴呆症疼痛评估的知识与态度:一项文献综述
Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Jun;22(3):281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
Clinical Utility of the Behavioral Pain Assessment Tool in Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit.行为疼痛评估工具在重症监护病房入院患者中的临床应用
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;24(8):695-700. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23521.

《重症监护疼痛观察工具》印尼语版本的跨文化适应与验证

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the Critical-care Pain Observation Tool.

作者信息

Asriyanto Luthfi Fauzy, Chayati Nur

机构信息

Master of Nursing Program, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Jan 1;11(1):113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.013
PMID:38352280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859591/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Critical-care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the most accurate methods for assessing pain in ICU patients with critical illness and/or a decreased level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the CPOT.

METHODS

The English version of CPOT was translated into the Indonesian version following five steps: initial translation, synthesis of instrument translation results, back translation, validation of the instrument by an expert committee, and testing of the Indonesian instrument. Between September and December 2022, a total of 52 ICU patients from four hospitals in Indonesia were evaluated for pain at rest, during body-turning procedure, and 15 minutes after the procedure using the CPOT. The researcher used the verbal Faces Pain Thermometer (FPT) instrument as a gold standard to assess the CPOT's criteria validity. Validity assessments included content and criterion validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and interrater reliability.

RESULTS

Higher CPOT scores were found during the body-turning procedure than at rest and after the procedure. The instrument's item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, and the overall instrument's average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.93. The statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation () between the CPOT and the patient's FPT scores (0.877-0.983,  < 0.01). The significant agreement amongst raters () revealed the inter-rater reliability of the CPOT (0.739-0.834,  < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Indonesian version of the CPOT has been proven valid and reliable in assessing pain in patients with critical illness and/or decreased LOC.

摘要

目的

重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)是评估患有危重病和/或意识水平(LOC)下降的ICU患者疼痛的最准确方法之一。本研究旨在确定印尼语版CPOT的有效性和可靠性。

方法

CPOT英语版按照五个步骤翻译成印尼语版:初始翻译、工具翻译结果的综合、回译、由专家委员会对工具进行验证以及对印尼语工具进行测试。在2022年9月至12月期间,使用CPOT对印度尼西亚四家医院的52名ICU患者在休息时、翻身过程中以及翻身过程后15分钟的疼痛情况进行了评估。研究人员使用言语面部疼痛温度计(FPT)工具作为评估CPOT标准效度的金标准。效度评估包括内容效度和标准效度。使用克朗巴哈α系数和评分者间信度评估信度。

结果

在翻身过程中发现的CPOT评分高于休息时和翻身过程后。该工具的条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)范围为0.75至1.00,整个工具的平均量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.93。统计分析显示CPOT与患者FPT评分之间呈正相关(0.877 - 0.983,< 0.01)。评分者之间的显著一致性()显示了CPOT的评分者间信度(0.739 - 0.834,< 0.01)。

结论

已证明印尼语版CPOT在评估患有危重病和/或LOC下降的患者的疼痛方面是有效且可靠的。