• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习如何影响非符号数字处理:点比较任务中的反馈效应。

How learning influences non-symbolic numerical processing: effects of feedback in the dot comparison task.

作者信息

Hofmann Wiebke, Kinder Annette, Pekár Judit

机构信息

Institute of Psychology of Learning, Department of Education and Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;14:1287429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287429. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287429
PMID:38352965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10861774/
Abstract

It has long been debated how humans estimate the numerosity of sets of elements and what role continuous visual properties play in this process. The dot comparison task, in which the more numerous of two dot arrays must be selected, is a dominant method to investigate this phenomenon. It has been shown that the visual properties of the two dot patterns strongly influence the comparison. This influence can be systematically investigated by manipulating visual properties congruently and incongruently with numerosity. However, it remains unclear how learning and prior experience affect the influence of the visual properties. To address this question, we introduced feedback into the classical dot comparison task: during the learning phase, participants in the experimental group received feedback after each trial indicating whether their answer was correct whereas participants in the control group did not. After the learning phase, neither group received feedback. The convex hull of the dot patterns and the average dot diameter were manipulated congruently and incongruently with numerosity. Our results show that feedback had no effect on overall performance. However, when manipulated separately, dot diameter no longer affected performance in the experimental group after the learning phase, but it did in the control group. Moreover, this effect remained visible even when diameter and convex hull were manipulated simultaneously. This pattern of results is consistent with the notion of sensory integration which proposes that weights are assigned to different visual cues and that numerical judgments depend on an additive combination of these weights. We also found a correlation between performance on an arithmetic task and performance on trials in which dot size was manipulated incongruently with numerosity. However, there were no correlations between an inhibition task and performance in the dot comparison task. Taken together, the current results suggest that learning with feedback may affect some visual properties but not others. Future studies should further investigate a wider range of visual properties to examine which of them can be influenced by learning and under what conditions learning occurs.

摘要

长期以来,人们一直在争论人类如何估计元素集合的数量,以及连续视觉属性在这一过程中扮演什么角色。点比较任务是研究这一现象的主要方法,在该任务中,必须从两个点阵列中选择数量较多的那个。研究表明,两个点图案的视觉属性会强烈影响比较结果。通过与数量一致和不一致地操纵视觉属性,可以系统地研究这种影响。然而,学习和先前经验如何影响视觉属性的影响仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们在经典的点比较任务中引入了反馈:在学习阶段,实验组的参与者在每次试验后都会收到反馈,表明他们的答案是否正确,而对照组的参与者则没有。学习阶段结束后,两组都不再收到反馈。点图案的凸包和平均点直径与数量一致和不一致地进行操纵。我们的结果表明,反馈对整体表现没有影响。然而,当分别操纵时,学习阶段后,点直径在实验组中不再影响表现,但在对照组中仍有影响。此外,即使同时操纵直径和凸包,这种影响仍然可见。这种结果模式与感觉整合的概念一致,该概念提出,权重被分配给不同的视觉线索,数字判断取决于这些权重的相加组合。我们还发现算术任务的表现与点大小与数量不一致操纵的试验中的表现之间存在相关性。然而,抑制任务与点比较任务的表现之间没有相关性。综上所述,目前的结果表明,有反馈的学习可能会影响一些视觉属性,但不会影响其他属性。未来的研究应该进一步调查更广泛的视觉属性,以检查其中哪些可以受到学习的影响,以及在什么条件下会发生学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/5e7bf4bdc725/fpsyg-14-1287429-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/02d427782933/fpsyg-14-1287429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/3da91bb6c2c0/fpsyg-14-1287429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/544fbb3f28f4/fpsyg-14-1287429-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/9abe8fa7092c/fpsyg-14-1287429-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/d8167f59f853/fpsyg-14-1287429-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/2fe946222b9e/fpsyg-14-1287429-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/5e7bf4bdc725/fpsyg-14-1287429-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/02d427782933/fpsyg-14-1287429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/3da91bb6c2c0/fpsyg-14-1287429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/544fbb3f28f4/fpsyg-14-1287429-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/9abe8fa7092c/fpsyg-14-1287429-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/d8167f59f853/fpsyg-14-1287429-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/2fe946222b9e/fpsyg-14-1287429-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acda/10861774/5e7bf4bdc725/fpsyg-14-1287429-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
How learning influences non-symbolic numerical processing: effects of feedback in the dot comparison task.学习如何影响非符号数字处理:点比较任务中的反馈效应。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;14:1287429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287429. eCollection 2023.
2
The interplay between non-symbolic number and its continuous visual properties revisited: Effects of mixing trials of different types.重新审视非符号数字与其连续视觉属性之间的相互作用:不同类型混合试验的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):698-710. doi: 10.1177/1747021819891068. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
The role of visual information in numerosity estimation.视觉信息在数量估计中的作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037426. Epub 2012 May 17.
4
Mutual influences between numerical and non-numerical quantities in comparison tasks.比较任务中数值和非数值量之间的相互影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 May;74(5):843-852. doi: 10.1177/1747021820981876. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
5
Weaker number sense accounts for impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia: Behavioral and computational evidence.计算障碍中数量感知受损的原因是较弱的数感:行为和计算证据。
Dev Sci. 2024 Nov;27(6):e13538. doi: 10.1111/desc.13538. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
6
Congruency effects in dot comparison tasks: convex hull is more important than dot area.点比较任务中的一致性效应:凸包比点面积更重要。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2016 Nov 16;28(8):923-931. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1221828. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Developmental changes of the impact of visual cues on ANS acuity across grades 1-5: Different patterns of visual cues on numerosity processing.1至5年级视觉线索对自主神经系统敏锐度影响的发育变化:数字处理中视觉线索的不同模式。
Iperception. 2024 Jun 5;15(3):20416695241259160. doi: 10.1177/20416695241259160. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
8
Looking for more food or more people? Task context influences basic numerosity perception.寻求更多的食物还是更多的人?任务背景影响基本数值感知。
Cortex. 2019 May;114:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.021. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
9
Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison.视空间(而非言语)执行工作记忆容量调节数量比较期间对非数值视觉大小的易感性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0214270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214270. eCollection 2019.
10
Does auditory numerosity and non-numerical magnitude affect visual non-symbolic numerical representation?听觉数量和非数字大小会影响视觉非符号数字表征吗?
Perception. 2023 Jan;52(1):21-39. doi: 10.1177/03010066221133908. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrophysiological Correlates of the Interaction of Physical and Numerical Size in Symbolic Number Processing: Insights from a Novel Go/Nogo Numerical Stroop Task.符号数字处理中物理大小与数字大小交互作用的电生理关联:来自新型Go/Nogo数字斯特鲁普任务的见解
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 22;13(5):702. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050702.
2
Introducing CUSTOM: A customized, ultraprecise, standardization-oriented, multipurpose algorithm for generating nonsymbolic number stimuli.介绍CUSTOM:一种用于生成非符号数字刺激的定制化、超精确、面向标准化的多用途算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1528-1537. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01332-z.
3
The interplay between non-symbolic number and its continuous visual properties revisited: Effects of mixing trials of different types.
重新审视非符号数字与其连续视觉属性之间的相互作用:不同类型混合试验的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):698-710. doi: 10.1177/1747021819891068. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
5
Learning to focus on number.学习专注于数字。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
6
Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review.数字处理的基础是感觉统合系统而非近似数系统:一项批判性综述。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Nov;171:17-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
From "sense of number" to "sense of magnitude": The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition.从“数字感”到“大小感”:连续数量在数值认知中的作用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e164. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000960. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
One tamed at a time: A new approach for controlling continuous magnitudes in numerical comparison tasks.一次控制一个:数值比较任务中控制连续量值的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):1120-1127. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0772-7.
9
Number skills are maintained in healthy ageing.数字技能在健康老龄化过程中得以保持。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Mar;69:25-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
10
Infants Show Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination Regardless of Set Size.无论集合大小如何,婴儿都表现出比率依赖的数字辨别能力。
Infancy. 2013 Nov 1;18(6). doi: 10.1111/infa.12008.