• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告结局测量信息系统在原发性髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征中的两年良好表现

The Promising 2-Year Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

作者信息

Vogel Michael J, Wright-Chisem Joshua, Alvero Alexander B, Chan Jimmy J, Chapman Reagan S, Nho Shane J

机构信息

Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):998-1004. doi: 10.1177/03635465241227181. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1177/03635465241227181
PMID:38353059
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds have been previously defined for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; however, the MCID and PASS thresholds are yet to be defined for the PROMIS at 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE

(1) To establish MCID and PASS thresholds for the PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) at 2-year follow-up and (2) to correlate PROMIS scores with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between August and November 2020 with preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative data were identified. Collected scores included those for the PROMIS-PI, PROMIS-PF, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. MCID thresholds were calculated using the distribution-based method and PASS thresholds using the anchor-based method. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare scores between PROMs.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients met the criteria for inclusion (72.3% female; mean age, 36.9 ± 13.5 years; mean body mass index, 26.2 ± 6.0). The mean follow-up was 25.3 ± 3.3 months. Significant preoperative to postoperative improvements were observed for all PROMs ( < .001). MCID thresholds and achievement rates were as follows: HOS-ADL, 10.1 and 75%, respectively; HOS-SS, 13.8 and 79%, respectively; iHOT-12, 14.0 and 67%, respectively; VAS pain, -13.8 and 78%, respectively; PROMIS-PI, -4.7 and 65%, respectively; and PROMIS-PF, 5.8 and 60%, respectively. PASS thresholds and achievement rates were as follows: HOS-ADL, 78.7 and 67%, respectively; HOS-SS, 76.4 and 62%, respectively; iHOT-12, 67.4 and 60%, respectively; VAS pain, 25.5 and 61%, respectively; PROMIS-PI, 57.0 and 65%, respectively; and PROMIS-PF, 45.6 and 58%, respectively. PROMIS-PI scores correlated most strongly with HOS-ADL ( = -0.836), HOS-SS ( = -0.767), and iHOT-12 ( = -0.719) scores and exhibited at least moderate correlations (≥-0.595) with the other PROM scores. PROMIS-PF demonstrated moderate correlations with all the other PROM scores (≥-0.586). Strong correlations were seen between the hip-specific PROM scores (≥-0.745).

CONCLUSION

This study defined 2-year MCID and PASS thresholds for the PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PF and demonstrated moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS scores and hip-specific PROM scores.

摘要

背景

对于因股骨髋臼撞击综合征接受髋关节镜手术的患者,先前已定义了患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在1年随访时的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值;然而,PROMIS在2年随访时的MCID和PASS阈值尚未确定。

目的

(1)确定PROMIS疼痛干扰(PROMIS-PI)和PROMIS身体功能(PROMIS-PF)在2年随访时的MCID和PASS阈值,(2)将PROMIS评分与髋关节特异性患者报告结局测量(PROM)评分进行相关性分析。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3级。

方法

确定2020年8月至11月间因股骨髋臼撞击综合征接受初次髋关节镜手术且有术前和至少2年术后数据的患者。收集的评分包括PROMIS-PI、PROMIS-PF、髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)、髋关节结局评分-运动子量表(HOS-SS)、国际髋关节结局工具-12(iHOT-12)以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用基于分布的方法计算MCID阈值,使用基于锚定的方法计算PASS阈值。采用Pearson相关系数比较各PROM之间的评分。

结果

共有65例患者符合纳入标准(女性占72.3%;平均年龄36.9±13.5岁;平均体重指数26.2±6.0)。平均随访时间为25.3±3.3个月。所有PROM从术前到术后均有显著改善(P<0.001)。MCID阈值及达成率如下:HOS-ADL分别为10.1和75%;HOS-SS分别为13.8和79%;iHOT-12分别为14.0和67%;VAS疼痛分别为-13.8和78%;PROMIS-PI分别为-4.7和65%;PROMIS-PF分别为5.8和60%。PASS阈值及达成率如下:HOS-ADL分别为78.7和67%;HOS-SS分别为76.4和62%;iHOT-12分别为67.4和60%;VAS疼痛分别为25.5和61%;PROMIS-PI分别为57.0和65%;PROMIS-PF分别为45.6和58%。PROMIS-PI评分与HOS-ADL(r=-0.836)、HOS-SS(r=-0.767)和iHOT-12(r=-0.719)评分相关性最强,与其他PROM评分至少呈中度相关(≥-0.595)。PROMIS-PF与所有其他PROM评分呈中度相关(≥-0.586)。髋关节特异性PROM评分之间呈强相关(≥-0.745)。

结论

本研究确定了PROMIS-PI和PROMIS-PF在2年时的MCID和PASS阈值,并证明了PROMIS评分与髋关节特异性PROM评分之间存在中度至强相关性。

相似文献

1
The Promising 2-Year Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.患者报告结局测量信息系统在原发性髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征中的两年良好表现
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):998-1004. doi: 10.1177/03635465241227181. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
2
Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.确定接受髋关节镜检查治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征患者在1年随访时患者报告结局测量信息系统测试中的临床显著改善情况。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(9):2457-2465. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015687. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery.患者报告结局测量信息系统的身体功能在关节镜下髋关节手术后,与传统的特定髋关节患者报告结局测量指标相比,效应量更低且反应性更差。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Dec;36(12):2992-2997. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.患者报告结局测量信息系统测试在接受关节镜检查治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的患者中,其反应性低于传统的特定髋关节患者报告结局指标。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 27;3(6):e1645-e1650. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.020. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Endoscopic Gluteus Medius or Minimus Repair With or Without Labral Treatment and Routine Capsular Closure at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.定义经内镜臀中肌或臀小肌修复术且(或)伴有盂唇处理,以及常规囊壁缝合术后至少 5 年随访时的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Aug;50(10):2629-2636. doi: 10.1177/03635465221105469.
6
Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes.采用关节囊处理的髋关节镜手术治疗股骨髋臼撞击症:与取得临床显著疗效相关的因素
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):288-296. doi: 10.1177/0363546517739824. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
7
Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.定义在至少 5 年随访时关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的临床有意义的结局。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):901-907. doi: 10.1177/0363546520902736.
8
Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Chondrolabral Refixation, Osteochondroplasty, and Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.髋关节镜下软骨盂唇缝合固定、骨软骨成形术和常规囊闭合并治疗髋关节撞击综合征:至少 10 年随访的临床结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):24-33. doi: 10.1177/03635465231212663.
9
Determining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale in Athletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.确定髋关节镜手术治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征运动员髋关节结局评分运动特异性亚量表的临床有意义阈值。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Sep;50(11):3009-3018. doi: 10.1177/03635465221114400. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
10
Threshold Values for Success After Hip Arthroscopy Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Assessment: Determining the Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State.髋关节镜术后使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统评估的成功阈值:确定最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3280-3287. doi: 10.1177/0363546520960461. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Arthroscopic Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Repair.确定关节镜下单纯后内侧半月板根部修复术后的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 8;13(7):23259671251326940. doi: 10.1177/23259671251326940. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Defining Clinically Significant Outcome Thresholds for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 2 Years After Gluteus Medius and/or Minimus Repair.确定臀中肌和/或臀小肌修复术后2年患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)的临床显著结局阈值。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 7;12(11):23259671241281746. doi: 10.1177/23259671241281746. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Several factors predict the achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.对于前交叉韧带重建术后患者报告结局指标而言,有几个因素可预测患者可接受症状状态的达成以及最小临床重要差异:一项系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 May;33(5):1617-1632. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12460. Epub 2024 Sep 9.