Mellgren Jonas, Maltese Giovanni, Tarnow Peter, Bhatti-Søfteland Madiha, Kölby Lars, Säljö Karin
Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Feb 14;35(3):715-20. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010035.
Craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with extensive cranial vault reconstructions (CVRs). Although less invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy, have been successful, they also present difficulties. An alternative method is distraction osteogenesis using either manually controlled devices or specially designed springs. In this study, the authors provide the first comparison of spring-assisted surgery (SAS) with CVR for the treatment of unilambdoid synostosis (ULS). Fourteen consecutive patients (8 CVR and 6 SAS) treated for ULS at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2005 and 2018 were included. Skull shape and deviations were evaluated using previously defined measurement points on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans preoperatively, at spring removal, and at 3 years of age. Posterior and middle cranial fossa (PCF and MCF, respectively), skull-base cant, facial twist, and mastoid bulge (MB) were measured, and clinical data were obtained from chart reviews. The results indicated that at the 3-year follow-up, PCF, MCF, and MB improved in both groups, with no significant difference in outcome observed between methods. In the SAS group, duration of operation [61±27 min (mean±SD)] and perioperative bleeding (3.5±2.8 mL/kg body weight) were both significantly lower relative to the CVR group (P<0.05). These findings showed that both SAS and CVR resulted in similar improvements in treating ULS, although neither produced complete normalization of skull shape. The results suggest that early diagnosis and operation allow less extensive SAS to be performed without adversely affecting the results.
传统上,颅缝早闭采用广泛的颅穹窿重建术(CVR)进行治疗。尽管诸如内镜下条状颅骨切除术联合术后头盔治疗等侵入性较小的技术已取得成功,但它们也存在困难。另一种方法是使用手动控制装置或专门设计的弹簧进行牵张成骨。在本研究中,作者首次比较了弹簧辅助手术(SAS)与CVR治疗单颞骨缝早闭(ULS)的效果。纳入了2005年至2018年间在萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院接受ULS治疗的14例连续患者(8例CVR和6例SAS)。术前、弹簧拆除时以及3岁时,使用先前在三维计算机断层扫描上定义的测量点评估颅骨形状和偏差。测量后颅窝和中颅窝(分别为PCF和MCF)、颅底倾斜度、面部扭转和乳突隆起(MB),并从病历回顾中获取临床数据。结果表明,在3年随访时,两组的PCF、MCF和MB均有改善,两种方法的结果无显著差异。在SAS组中,手术时间[61±27分钟(平均值±标准差)]和围手术期出血量(3.5±2.8毫升/千克体重)均显著低于CVR组(P<0.05)。这些发现表明,SAS和CVR在治疗ULS方面均产生了相似的改善,尽管两者均未使颅骨形状完全正常化。结果表明,早期诊断和手术允许进行范围较小的SAS,而不会对结果产生不利影响。