Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for Septic Shock? A Debate on Steroids.
作者信息
Tsolaki Vasiliki, Siempos Ilias I
机构信息
University Hospital of Larissa University of Thessaly Faculty of Medicine Larissa, Greece.
Evangelismos Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School Athens, Greece.
出版信息
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 May 15;209(10):1179-1180. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0175ED.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for Septic Shock? A Debate on Steroids.脓毒性休克的单药治疗还是联合治疗？关于类固醇的争论。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 May 15;209(10):1179-1180. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202401-0175ED.
2
Steroids and Sepsis: the Debate Continues.类固醇与脓毒症：争论仍在继续。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2019 Spring;57(2):17-30. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000220.
3
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.用于感染性休克患者的皮质类固醇。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):41-2; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.41-d.
4
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):41; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.41-c.
5
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.用于感染性休克患者的皮质类固醇。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):41; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.41-a.
6
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.用于感染性休克患者的皮质类固醇。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):42; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.42-a.
7
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):41; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.41-b.
8
Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock.用于感染性休克患者的皮质类固醇。
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):42; author reply 43-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.42-b.
9
Controversy in shock research. Con: The role of steroids in septic shock.休克研究中的争议。反方观点：类固醇在感染性休克中的作用。
Circ Shock. 1981;8(6):673-82.
10
Controversy in shock research. Pro: The role of steroids in septic shock.休克研究中的争议。正方观点：类固醇在感染性休克中的作用。
Circ Shock. 1981;8(6):667-71.
本文引用的文献
1
Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Adults with Septic Shock.成人脓毒性休克患者低剂量氢化可的松的患者水平荟萃分析。
NEJM Evid. 2023 Jun;2(6):EVIDoa2300034. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300034. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Effectiveness of Fludrocortisone Plus Hydrocortisone versus Hydrocortisone Alone in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.氟氢可的松联合氢化可的松与单独使用氢化可的松治疗脓毒性休克的疗效：随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 May 15;209(10):1219-1228. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1785OC.
3
The pathophysiology of sepsis and precision-medicine-based immunotherapy.脓毒症的病理生理学与基于精准医学的免疫治疗。
Nat Immunol. 2024 Jan;25(1):19-28. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01660-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
4
Association of Noninvasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of the ENIO Prospective Observational Study.无创性呼吸支持与机械通气颅脑损伤患者拔管结局的相关性：ENIO 前瞻性观察研究的二次分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;208(3):270-279. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2249OC.
5
Sepsis subphenotyping based on organ dysfunction trajectory.基于器官功能轨迹的脓毒症亚表型分型。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 3;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04071-4.
6
Association between Type of Fluid Received Prior to Enrollment, Type of Admission, and Effect of Balanced Crystalloid in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of the BaSICS Clinical Trial.在入组前接受的液体类型、入院类型与危重症成人中平衡晶体液效应之间的关联：BaSICS 临床试验的二次探索性分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 15;205(12):1419-1428. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202111-2484OC.
7
Association of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Lung Recruitment Selection Strategies with Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.呼气末正压和肺复张选择策略与急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的关联：系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;205(11):1300-1310. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202108-1972OC.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动：2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
9
Using Bayesian Methods to Augment the Interpretation of Critical Care Trials. An Overview of Theory and Example Reanalysis of the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial.使用贝叶斯方法增强重症监护试验的解释。理论概述和急性呼吸窘迫综合征试验肺泡复张的实例再分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;203(5):543-552. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2381CP.
10
Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making?危重病临床研究：贝叶斯方法能否增强临床和科学决策？
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Zotero 插件