Division of Health Informatics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E. 61st Street, 3rd Floor, Suite 301, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Department of Preventive Medicine Center for Health Information Partnerships, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Rubloff Building 11th Floor, 750 N Lake Shore, Chicago, IL, USA.
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 3;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04071-4.
Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome, and the identification of clinical subphenotypes is essential. Although organ dysfunction is a defining element of sepsis, subphenotypes of differential trajectory are not well studied. We sought to identify distinct Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score trajectory-based subphenotypes in sepsis.
We created 72-h SOFA score trajectories in patients with sepsis from four diverse intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts. We then used dynamic time warping (DTW) to compute heterogeneous SOFA trajectory similarities and hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) to identify trajectory-based subphenotypes. Patient characteristics were compared between subphenotypes and a random forest model was developed to predict subphenotype membership at 6 and 24 h after being admitted to the ICU. The model was tested on three validation cohorts. Sensitivity analyses were performed with alternative clustering methodologies.
A total of 4678, 3665, 12,282, and 4804 unique sepsis patients were included in development and three validation cohorts, respectively. Four subphenotypes were identified in the development cohort: Rapidly Worsening (n = 612, 13.1%), Delayed Worsening (n = 960, 20.5%), Rapidly Improving (n = 1932, 41.3%), and Delayed Improving (n = 1174, 25.1%). Baseline characteristics, including the pattern of organ dysfunction, varied between subphenotypes. Rapidly Worsening was defined by a higher comorbidity burden, acidosis, and visceral organ dysfunction. Rapidly Improving was defined by vasopressor use without acidosis. Outcomes differed across the subphenotypes, Rapidly Worsening had the highest in-hospital mortality (28.3%, P-value < 0.001), despite a lower SOFA (mean: 4.5) at ICU admission compared to Rapidly Improving (mortality:5.5%, mean SOFA: 5.5). An overall prediction accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI, [0.77, 0.8]) was obtained at 6 h after ICU admission, which increased to 0.87 (95% CI, [0.86, 0.88]) at 24 h. Similar subphenotypes were replicated in three validation cohorts. The majority of patients with sepsis have an improving phenotype with a lower mortality risk; however, they make up over 20% of all deaths due to their larger numbers.
Four novel, clinically-defined, trajectory-based sepsis subphenotypes were identified and validated. Identifying trajectory-based subphenotypes has immediate implications for the powering and predictive enrichment of clinical trials. Understanding the pathophysiology of these differential trajectories may reveal unanticipated therapeutic targets and identify more precise populations and endpoints for clinical trials.
脓毒症是一种异质性综合征,识别临床亚表型至关重要。尽管器官功能障碍是脓毒症的一个定义特征,但不同轨迹的亚表型尚未得到很好的研究。我们试图确定脓毒症中不同的Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)评分轨迹为基础的亚表型。
我们从四个不同的重症监护病房(ICU)队列中创建了 72 小时 SOFA 评分轨迹的脓毒症患者。然后,我们使用动态时间 warping(DTW)计算不同的 SOFA 轨迹相似性,并使用层次聚类(HAC)识别基于轨迹的亚表型。比较亚表型之间的患者特征,并开发了一个随机森林模型,以预测 ICU 入院后 6 小时和 24 小时的亚表型归属。该模型在三个验证队列中进行了测试。使用替代聚类方法进行了敏感性分析。
在开发队列中总共纳入了 4678、3665、12282 和 4804 例独特的脓毒症患者,分别用于三个验证队列。在开发队列中确定了四个亚表型:快速恶化(n=612,13.1%)、延迟恶化(n=960,20.5%)、快速改善(n=1932,41.3%)和延迟改善(n=1174,25.1%)。亚表型之间的基线特征,包括器官功能障碍的模式,各不相同。快速恶化的特点是合并症负担更高、酸中毒和内脏器官功能障碍。快速改善的特点是使用血管加压药而没有酸中毒。不同的亚表型之间的结局也不同,快速恶化的住院死亡率最高(28.3%,P 值<0.001),尽管 ICU 入院时的 SOFA 评分(平均值:4.5)低于快速改善(死亡率:5.5%,平均 SOFA:5.5)。ICU 入院后 6 小时的总体预测准确率为 0.78(95%置信区间,[0.77,0.8]),24 小时后增加到 0.87(95%置信区间,[0.86,0.88])。在三个验证队列中复制了类似的亚表型。大多数脓毒症患者具有改善的表型,其死亡风险较低;然而,由于数量较多,它们占所有死亡人数的 20%以上。
确定了四个新的、临床定义的、基于轨迹的脓毒症亚表型,并进行了验证。识别基于轨迹的亚表型对临床试验的动力和预测性富集具有直接意义。了解这些不同轨迹的病理生理学可能会揭示意想不到的治疗靶点,并确定更精确的临床试验人群和终点。