United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Rabies Management Program, Concord, NH, 03301, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Apr;225:106145. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106145. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
The raccoon (Procyon lotor) variant of the rabies virus (RRV) is enzootic in the eastern United States and oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is the primary strategy to prevent and control landscape spread. Breaches of ORV management zones occasionally occur, and emergency "contingency" actions may be implemented to enhance local control. Contingency actions are an integral part of landscape-scale wildlife rabies management but can be very costly and routinely involve enhanced rabies surveillance (ERS) around the index case. We investigated two contingency actions in Ohio (2017-2019 and 2018-2021) and one in Virginia (2017-2019) using a dynamic, multi-method occupancy approach to examine relationships between specific management actions and RRV occurrence, including whether ERS was sufficient around the index case. The RRV occupancy was assessed seasonally at 100-km grids and we examined relationships across three spatial scales (regional management zone, RRV free regions, and local contingency areas). The location of a grid relative to the ORV management zone was the strongest predictor of RRV occupancy at the regional scale. In RRV free regions, the neighbor effect and temporal variability were most important in influencing RRV occupancy. Parenteral (hand) vaccination of raccoons was important across all three contingency action areas, but more influential in the Ohio contingency action areas where more raccoons were hand vaccinated. In the Virginia contingency action area, ORV strategies were as important in reducing RRV occupancy as a hand vaccination strategy. The management action to trap, euthanize, and test (TET) raccoons was an important method to increase ERS, yet the impacts of TET on RRV occupancy are not clear. The probability of detecting additional cases of RRV was exceptionally high (>0.95) during the season the index case occurred. The probability of detecting RRV through ERS declined in the seasons following initial TET efforts but remained higher after the contingency action compared to the ERS detection probabilities prior to index case incidence. Local RRV cases were contained within one year and eliminated within 2-3 years of each contingency action.
浣熊(浣熊)变异的狂犬病病毒(RRV)在美东地区是地方性的,口服狂犬病疫苗(ORV)是预防和控制景观传播的主要策略。ORV 管理区偶尔会发生违规行为,可能会实施紧急“应急”行动来加强局部控制。应急行动是景观尺度野生动物狂犬病管理的一个组成部分,但可能非常昂贵,并且通常包括围绕索引病例的增强狂犬病监测(ERS)。我们使用动态的、多方法的占有率方法研究了俄亥俄州的两个应急行动(2017-2019 年和 2018-2021 年)和弗吉尼亚州的一个应急行动(2017-2019 年),以检查特定管理行动与 RRV 发生之间的关系,包括索引病例周围的 ERS 是否足够。RRV 占有率在 100 公里网格上进行季节性评估,我们在三个空间尺度(区域管理区、RRV 自由区和局部应急区)上检查了关系。网格相对于 ORV 管理区的位置是区域尺度上 RRV 占有率的最强预测因子。在 RRV 自由区,邻居效应和时间变异性对 RRV 占有率的影响最大。浣熊的肠胃外(手部)疫苗接种在所有三个应急行动区都很重要,但在俄亥俄州的应急行动区更为重要,因为那里有更多的浣熊接受了手部疫苗接种。在弗吉尼亚州的应急行动区,ORV 策略与手部疫苗接种策略一样重要,可以降低 RRV 的占有率。诱捕、安乐死和测试(TET)浣熊的管理行动是增加 ERS 的重要方法,但 TET 对 RRV 占有率的影响尚不清楚。在索引病例发生的季节,检测到额外 RRV 病例的概率异常高(>0.95)。在初始 TET 努力后的季节,通过 ERS 检测到 RRV 的概率下降,但与索引病例发生前的 ERS 检测概率相比,在应急行动后仍然更高。当地的 RRV 病例在一年内得到控制,并在每个应急行动后的 2-3 年内消除。