Quantitative evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic value of different quantitative methods of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in benign and malignant mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal and hilar lymph node enlargement in our hospital between January 2019 and August 2022. We compared different quantitative elastography parameters [red area ratio (RAR, lymph node red area/lymph node area), green area ratio (GAR, lymph node green area/lymph node area), blue area ratio (SAR, lymph node blue area/lymph node area), mixed area ratio (MAR, lymph node green area/lymph node area), blue-green lymph node area/lymph node area), strain rate ratio (SR), strain rate in the target lymph node (LPA), ratio of blue area to total lymph node area outside the center of the target lymph node (PAR), and average grey value (MGV)], in order to find the best quantitative evaluation method.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients (346 lymph nodes) were included in this study. All quantitative elastography parameters were statistically significant for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions except the average grey value of the target lymph nodes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SAR was 0.872 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.91), the cutoff value was 0.409, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 85.4%, 78.0%, 80.4%, and 83.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other types of quantitative analysis, SAR has a higher predictive significance for benign and malignant lymph nodes.