• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LAQUA-HF 试验的原理和方案:一项析因随机对照试验,评估神经激素和利尿剂对心力衰竭患者健康状况报告结局的影响。

Rationale and protocol of the LAQUA-HF trial: a factorial randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of neurohormonal and diuretic agents on health-status reported outcomes in heart failure patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

University of Missouri's Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality and Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e076519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076519.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076519
PMID:38355194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10868297/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The current guidelines strongly recommend early initiation of multiple classes of cardioprotective drugs for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to improve prognosis and health status. However, evidence on the optimal sequencing of approved drugs is scarce, highlighting the importance of individualised treatment plans. Registry data indicate that only a portion of these patients can tolerate all four recommended classes, underscoring the need to establish the favoured sequence when using these drugs. Additionally, the choice between long-acting and short-acting loop diuretics in the present era remains uncertain. This is particularly relevant given the frequent use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, both of which potentiate natriuretic effects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint method, LAQUA-HF (Long-acting vs short-acting diuretics and neurohormonal Agents on patients' QUAlity-of-life in Heart Failure patients) will be a 2×2 factorial design, with a total of 240 patients randomised to sacubitril/valsartan versus dapagliflozin and torsemide versus furosemide in a 1:1 ratio. Most enrolment sites have participated in an ongoing observational registry for consecutive patients hospitalised for heart failure involved dedicated study coordinators, and used the same framework to enrol patients. The primary endpoint is the change in patients' health status over 6 months, defined by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Additionally, clinical benefit at 6 months defined as a hierarchical composite endpoint will be assessed by the win ratio as the secondary endpoint.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The medical ethics committee Keio University in Japan has approved this trial. All participants provide written informed consent prior to study entry. The results of this trial will be disseminated in one main paper and additional papers on secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000045229.

摘要

简介

目前的指南强烈建议射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者早期开始使用多种类别的心脏保护药物,以改善预后和健康状况。然而,关于批准药物的最佳序贯应用的证据很少,这突显了制定个体化治疗方案的重要性。登记数据表明,只有一部分患者可以耐受所有四类推荐药物,这强调了在使用这些药物时确定首选药物顺序的必要性。此外,在当前时代,长效和短效袢利尿剂的选择仍然不确定。这一点尤其重要,因为血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂的使用频率很高,这两种药物都增强了利钠作用。

方法和分析

在一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点的方法中,LAQUA-HF(长效与短效利尿剂和神经激素制剂对心力衰竭患者生活质量的影响)将采用 2×2 析因设计,总共 240 例患者随机分为沙库巴曲缬沙坦组与达格列净组和托塞米组与呋塞米组,比例为 1:1。大多数入组地点都参与了一项连续的心力衰竭住院患者观察性登记研究,配备了专门的研究协调员,并使用相同的框架入组患者。主要终点是 6 个月内患者健康状况的变化,定义为堪萨斯城心肌病问卷。此外,6 个月时的临床获益定义为分层复合终点,将通过赢率作为次要终点进行评估。

伦理和传播

日本庆应义塾大学的医学伦理委员会已批准该试验。所有参与者在入组前均提供书面知情同意书。该试验的结果将在一篇主要论文和其他关于次要终点和亚组分析的论文中公布。

试验注册号

UMIN000045229。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/10868297/cd2464dfe318/bmjopen-2023-076519f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/10868297/cd2464dfe318/bmjopen-2023-076519f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6d/10868297/cd2464dfe318/bmjopen-2023-076519f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Rationale and protocol of the LAQUA-HF trial: a factorial randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of neurohormonal and diuretic agents on health-status reported outcomes in heart failure patients.LAQUA-HF 试验的原理和方案:一项析因随机对照试验,评估神经激素和利尿剂对心力衰竭患者健康状况报告结局的影响。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 14;14(2):e076519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076519.
2
Rationale and design of Dapagliflozin vErsus SacubiTrIl-valsartaN therapY in Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (DESTINY-HF): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial protocol.达格列净与沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效和设计(DESTINY-HF):一项实用型随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 18;14(10):e089562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089562.
3
Sacubitril/valsartan and loop diuretic requirement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the PARAGON-HF trial.PARAGON-HF 试验中射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中沙库巴曲缬沙坦和袢利尿剂的需求。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jan;25(1):87-94. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2703. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the PARAGON-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗射血分数保留心力衰竭:PARAGON-HF 试验的原理和设计。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Standard Medical Therapies on Plasma NT-proBNP Concentration and Submaximal Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: The PARALLAX Randomized Clinical Trial.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对比标准药物治疗对射血分数保留心力衰竭患者血浆 NT-proBNP 浓度和亚极量运动能力的影响:PARALLAX 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 16;326(19):1919-1929. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18463.
6
Sacubitril/Valsartan in Advanced Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the LIFE Trial.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中的应用:LIFE 试验的原理和设计。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;8(10):789-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Reduced loop diuretic use in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril: the PARADIGM-HF trial.与依那普利相比,服用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的患者减少了利尿剂的使用:PARADIGM-HF 试验。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;21(3):337-341. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1402. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与缬沙坦对射血分数保留心力衰竭女性与男性患者的影响:PARAGON-HF 研究的见解。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044491. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
9
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂在射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
10
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.

本文引用的文献

1
Polypharmacy and Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure: The GUIDE-IT Trial.心力衰竭中多病共治与指南导向的优化药物治疗:GUIDE-IT 试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Nov;11(11):1507-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Phenotyping of Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Focused on Noncardiac Conditions: A Latent Class Analysis From a Multicenter Registry of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure.老年心力衰竭患者表型分析侧重于非心脏疾病:一项来自心力衰竭住院患者多中心登记的潜在类别分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e027689. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027689. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Effect of Torsemide vs Furosemide After Discharge on All-Cause Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: The TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.
托塞米与呋塞米出院后对心力衰竭住院患者全因死亡率的影响:TRANSFORM-HF 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jan 17;329(3):214-223. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23924.
4
Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines: an international cardiology survey.遵循2021年欧洲心脏病学会指南对射血分数降低的心力衰竭进行治疗的序贯和滴定方法:一项国际心脏病学调查
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;25(2):213-222. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2743. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial.升阶梯治疗急性心力衰竭指南导向的药物治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效(STRONG-HF):一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验。
Lancet. 2022 Dec 3;400(10367):1938-1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.达格列净治疗射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1089-1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
Multimorbidity, guideline-directed medical therapies, and associated outcomes among hospitalized heart failure patients.住院心力衰竭患者的多病共存、指南指导的医学治疗及相关结局。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2500-2510. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13954. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Conventional medical therapy in heart failure patients eligible for the PARADIGM-HF, DAPA-HF, and SHIFT trials.适用于PARADIGM-HF、DAPA-HF和SHIFT试验的心力衰竭患者的传统药物治疗。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;359:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Electronic Alerts to Improve Heart Failure Therapy in Outpatient Practice: A Cluster Randomized Trial.电子提醒改善门诊心力衰竭治疗:一项集群随机试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jun 7;79(22):2203-2213. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.338. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
10
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.