Veldman M A, Doolaard S, Bosker R J, Snijders T A B
Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen.
Department of Sociology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen.
Sch Psychol. 2025 May;40(3):366-378. doi: 10.1037/spq0000617. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
We studied the impact of cooperative learning on positive peer relationships, that is, liking to work together, in classroom networks. Cooperative learning was implemented as part of the "Success for All" program. Longitudinal social network analysis was used to investigate the development of structures and patterns of relationships in 16 intervention and 16 control classrooms, including a total of 791 students. Results showed significantly less reciprocation and transitivity in the dynamics of the intervention networks, while the number of nominations in the intervention classes was at least not smaller than in the control classes, indicating less tendency toward the formation of small clusters or cliques. We did not find that peer relationships became more diverse with regard to gender, socioeconomic status, or academic performance through the implementation of cooperative learning. In intervention classrooms, children tended to nominate their teammates with whom they work together in cooperative learning activities; however, also in control classrooms, children tended to nominate children with whom they are seated in the classroom. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们研究了合作学习对课堂网络中积极同伴关系(即喜欢一起合作)的影响。合作学习作为“全员成功”计划的一部分得以实施。我们运用纵向社会网络分析,对16个干预班和16个对照班(共791名学生)中人际关系的结构和模式发展进行了调查。结果显示,干预网络动态中的互惠性和传递性显著降低,而干预班中的提名数量至少不低于对照班,这表明形成小团体或小圈子的倾向较小。我们并未发现通过实施合作学习,同伴关系在性别、社会经济地位或学业成绩方面变得更加多样化。在干预课堂中,孩子们倾向于提名他们在合作学习活动中一起合作的队友;然而,在对照课堂中,孩子们也倾向于提名与他们在教室里同坐的孩子。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)