• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康信息系统研究中的定性研究方法综述

Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Health Information System Studies.

作者信息

Park Kyoungsoo, Moon Woojong

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Jan;30(1):16-34. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

DOI:10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16
PMID:38359846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10879827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review hospital-based health information system (HIS) studies that used qualitative research methods and evaluate their methodological contexts and implications. In addition, we propose practical guidelines for HIS researchers who plan to use qualitative research methods.

METHODS

We collected papers published from 2012 to 2022 by searching the PubMed and CINAHL databases. As search keywords, we used specific system terms related to HISs, such as "electronic medical records" and "clinical decision support systems," linked with their operational terms, such as "implementation" and "adaptation," and qualitative methodological terms such as "observation" and "in-depth interview." We finally selected 74 studies that met this review's inclusion criteria and conducted an analytical review of the selected studies.

RESULTS

We analyzed the selected articles according to the following four points: the general characteristics of the selected articles; research design; participant sampling, identification, and recruitment; and data collection, processing, and analysis. This review found methodologically problematic issues regarding researchers' reflections, participant sampling methods and research accessibility, and data management.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports on the qualitative research process should include descriptions of researchers' reflections and ethical considerations, which are meaningful for strengthening the rigor and credibility of qualitative research. Based on these discussions, we suggest guidance for conducting ethical, feasible, and reliable qualitative research on HISs in hospital settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾采用定性研究方法的基于医院的健康信息系统(HIS)研究,并评估其方法学背景及影响。此外,我们为计划使用定性研究方法的HIS研究人员提出实用指南。

方法

我们通过检索PubMed和CINAHL数据库收集了2012年至2022年发表的论文。作为检索关键词,我们使用了与HIS相关的特定系统术语,如“电子病历”和“临床决策支持系统”,并将其与操作术语(如“实施”和“适应”)以及定性方法学术语(如“观察”和“深入访谈”)相链接。我们最终筛选出74项符合本综述纳入标准的研究,并对所选研究进行了分析性综述。

结果

我们根据以下四点对所选文章进行了分析:所选文章的一般特征;研究设计;参与者抽样、识别和招募;以及数据收集、处理和分析。本综述发现了研究人员反思、参与者抽样方法和研究可及性以及数据管理等方法学上存在问题的方面。

结论

关于定性研究过程的报告应包括对研究人员反思和伦理考量的描述,这对于加强定性研究的严谨性和可信度具有重要意义。基于这些讨论,我们为在医院环境中对HIS进行伦理、可行且可靠的定性研究提供指导建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/10879827/ffcd6bfa3345/hir-2024-30-1-16f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/10879827/ffcd6bfa3345/hir-2024-30-1-16f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/10879827/ffcd6bfa3345/hir-2024-30-1-16f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Health Information System Studies.健康信息系统研究中的定性研究方法综述
Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Jan;30(1):16-34. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Researchers' experiences with patient engagement in health research: a scoping review and thematic synthesis.研究人员在健康研究中患者参与方面的经验:一项范围综述与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 10;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00431-8.
7
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
8
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record.伦理问题与电子健康记录
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2020 Oct/Dec;39(4):150-161. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000302.
3
Health Information Systems in the Digital Health Ecosystem-Problems and Solutions for Ethics, Trust and Privacy.数字健康生态系统中的健康信息系统——伦理、信任和隐私问题及解决方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):3006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093006.
4
Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants.从医一生,医者恒医:一项系统性综述,旨在构建针对涉及患者参与者的健康研究中医者-研究者双重角色体验的类型学。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 9;16:95. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0203-6.
5
The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.电子健康记录对医疗质量的影响:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):60-4. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv122. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
6
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
7
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.混合方法实施研究中定性数据收集与分析的目的抽样法
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
8
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.SEIPS 2.0:一种用于研究和改善医疗保健专业人员和患者工作的人因学框架。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Using a sociotechnical framework to understand adaptations in health IT implementation.利用社会技术框架理解健康信息技术实施中的调整。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Dec;82(12):e331-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review.电子健康记录中的安全性和隐私保护:系统文献综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Jun;46(3):541-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 8.