Department of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada; School of Ecosystem and Forest Science, Burnley campus, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia.
Future in Nature Pty Ltd, Australia; Melbourne School of Design, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Environ Res. 2024 Jun 1;250:118445. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118445. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
While urban trees can be important determinants of human health and wellbeing in world cities, the specific influence of nearby urban trees upon human wellbeing has not been adequately explored. While many studies have associated urban greenery abundance with wellbeing scores, many measures of urban greenery do not specify the type of vegetation or the impact of co-location. Here we fill this gap by associating self-reported measures of the presence of nearby trees (tree in front of one's home) with validated subjective wellbeing (SWB) scores. We also tested for the mediating role of what people thought about trees and nature, with a focus on the values people associate with urban trees and nature relatedness (NR). We used electronic panel survey data based on a demographic and geographical representative sample of more than 3400 residents living in Toronto, Canada, and Melbourne, Australia. We analysed these data using regression-based mediation and path analyses. We found that having a tree in front of one's home was strongly and positively associated with SWB scores in both cities with similar results (Melbourne, β = 0.17, p < 0.05; Toronto, β = 0.18, p < 0.05), while accounting for NR, values associated with urban trees, and demographics (e.g., age, education, home ownership). The mediating role of NR and values was small. The specific pathways of association between tree in front of one's home, SWB, NR, and values, varied by city, when accounting for demographics. We discuss how increasing the abundance of nearby urban trees in cities may also increase human wellbeing.
虽然城市树木可以成为世界城市中人类健康和福祉的重要决定因素,但附近城市树木对人类福祉的具体影响尚未得到充分探索。虽然许多研究将城市绿地的丰富度与幸福感得分联系起来,但许多城市绿地的衡量标准并未具体说明植被类型或共存的影响。在这里,我们通过将附近树木存在的自我报告测量值(家门口的树)与经过验证的主观幸福感(SWB)得分相关联来填补这一空白。我们还测试了人们对树木和自然的看法的中介作用,重点是人们与城市树木和自然关联性(NR)相关联的价值观。我们使用了基于电子小组调查的数据,该数据基于加拿大多伦多和澳大利亚墨尔本的一个具有人口统计学和地理代表性的 3400 多名居民的样本。我们使用基于回归的中介和路径分析来分析这些数据。我们发现,在这两个城市中,家门口有一棵树与 SWB 得分呈强烈正相关,结果相似(墨尔本,β=0.17,p<0.05;多伦多,β=0.18,p<0.05),同时考虑到 NR、与城市树木相关的价值观和人口统计学因素(例如年龄、教育程度、住房所有权)。NR 和价值观的中介作用很小。在考虑到人口统计学因素时,家门口树木、SWB、NR 和价值观之间的特定关联途径因城市而异。我们讨论了如何增加城市中附近城市树木的数量也可能会提高人类幸福感。