• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性和男性在工作场所及组织层面参与决策的经历。

Women's and men's experiences with participative decision-making at workplace and organizational levels.

作者信息

Plückelmann Clara, Gustafsson Sendén Marie, Bernhard-Oettel Claudia, Leineweber Constanze, Sczesny Sabine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1240117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240117. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240117
PMID:38362525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10867161/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The concept of participative decision-making (PDM) has been well established as a positive organizational factor, and has recently gained attention as a measure of gender inclusivity in the workplace. However, findings regarding gender differences in the experiences of PDM are inconclusive. This study hypothesized that women perceive themselves as less influential than men at the organizational level rather than at the workplace level. Furthermore, the study explored whether these assumed gender differences depend on the gender typicality of occupational positions and professions. We expected gender differences to be more pronounced for male-typed positions and professions (e.g., leadership, engineer) compared to non-male-typed occupational positions and professions (e.g., non-leadership, nurse).

METHODS

Data on experiences with participative decision-making at the workplace and organizational levels were drawn from a large representative Swedish survey ( = 10,500; 60% women).

RESULTS

Results showed that women experienced being less influential than men at the organizational level, whereas the experiences of women and men did not differ at the workplace level. The gender difference at the organizational level was not related to the gender typicality of position and profession.

DISCUSSION

The findings highlight the importance of the inclusion of both women and men in strategic, large-scale decisions for achieving gender equality at work.

摘要

引言

参与式决策(PDM)的概念已被确立为一种积极的组织因素,最近作为衡量职场性别包容性的一项指标受到关注。然而,关于参与式决策体验中性别差异的研究结果尚无定论。本研究假设,在组织层面而非职场层面,女性认为自己的影响力不如男性。此外,该研究探讨了这些假定的性别差异是否取决于职业岗位和职业的性别典型性。我们预计,与非男性典型职业岗位和职业(如非领导岗位、护士)相比,男性典型岗位和职业(如领导岗位、工程师)的性别差异会更明显。

方法

关于职场和组织层面参与式决策体验的数据来自一项具有广泛代表性的瑞典大型调查(n = 10500;60%为女性)。

结果

结果显示,在组织层面,女性感觉自己的影响力不如男性,而在职场层面,女性和男性的体验没有差异。组织层面的性别差异与岗位和职业的性别典型性无关。

讨论

研究结果凸显了让男性和女性都参与战略层面的大规模决策对于实现职场性别平等的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5c/10867161/bef1ec4cec75/fpsyg-14-1240117-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5c/10867161/8cab72774300/fpsyg-14-1240117-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5c/10867161/bef1ec4cec75/fpsyg-14-1240117-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5c/10867161/8cab72774300/fpsyg-14-1240117-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5c/10867161/bef1ec4cec75/fpsyg-14-1240117-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's and men's experiences with participative decision-making at workplace and organizational levels.女性和男性在工作场所及组织层面参与决策的经历。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1240117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240117. eCollection 2023.
2
Whose Issue Is It Anyway? The Effects of Leader Gender and Equality Message Framing on Men's and Women's Mobilization Toward Workplace Gender Equality.这到底是谁的问题?领导者性别和平等信息框架对男性和女性推动职场性别平等的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02497. eCollection 2018.
3
Gender equality in the 21st century: Overcoming barriers to women's leadership in global health.21 世纪的性别平等:克服全球卫生领域女性领导力的障碍。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Sep;86(9):1144-1173. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13059.
4
The experience of workplace gender discrimination for women registered nurses: A qualitative study.女性注册护士职场性别歧视体验:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jun;78(6):1743-1754. doi: 10.1111/jan.15137. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
5
Women in medical education: views and experiences from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.医学教育中的女性:沙特阿拉伯王国的观点与经历
Med Educ. 2016 Aug;50(8):852-65. doi: 10.1111/medu.12988.
6
Women's career progression to management positions in Jordan's health sector.约旦卫生部门中女性向管理岗位的职业晋升。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Jul 27;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-05-2022-0047.
7
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Saudi women's leadership experiences in the healthcare sector: A qualitative study.沙特女性在医疗保健领域的领导经验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 19;18(9):e0285187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285187. eCollection 2023.
9
Men's reactions to gender inequality in the workplace: From relative deprivation on behalf of women to collective action.男性对职场性别不平等的反应:从代表女性的相对剥夺感至集体行动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 17;13:999750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999750. eCollection 2022.
10
Organizational commitments to equality change how people view women's and men's professional success.组织对平等的承诺改变了人们对女性和男性职业成功的看法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56829-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators in implementing evidence-based practice: a parallel cross-sectional mixed methods study among nursing administrators.实施循证实践的障碍与促进因素:一项针对护理管理人员的平行横断面混合方法研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 10;24(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03059-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A power-sharing perspective on employees' participatory influence over organizational interventions: conceptual explorations.关于员工对组织干预的参与式影响的权力分享视角:概念性探索
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1185735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185735. eCollection 2023.
2
Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases.男性化的偏见:识别和减轻隐藏的文化偏见。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1022-1052. doi: 10.1037/rev0000209. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.
性别刻板印象已经发生了变化:1946 年至 2018 年美国民意调查的跨时间元分析。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):301-315. doi: 10.1037/amp0000494. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
4
Development of job demands, decision authority and social support in industries with different gender composition - Sweden, 1991-2013.不同性别构成行业中工作要求、决策权和社会支持的发展 - 瑞典,1991-2013 年。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6917-8.
5
Cross Cultural Analysis of Direct Employee Participation: Dealing With Gender and Cultural Values.员工直接参与的跨文化分析:应对性别与文化价值观
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00723. eCollection 2019.
6
Cohort Profile: The Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH).队列简介:瑞典健康纵向职业调查(SLOSH)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;47(3):691-692i. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx260.
7
Do Predictors of Career Success Differ between Swedish Women and Men? Data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH).瑞典男性和女性在职业成功的预测因素上存在差异吗?来自瑞典健康纵向职业调查(SLOSH)的数据。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 26;10(10):e0140516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140516. eCollection 2015.
8
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.对女性领导者偏见的角色一致性理论。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):573-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573.