Cardiff University, UK.
Bangor University, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):2829-2844. doi: 10.1177/15248380241227987. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
The mental health and wellbeing of children and young people who have been in care, primarily foster care, kinship care or residential care, remains a public health priority. The Care-experienced cHildren and young people's Interventions to improve Mental health and wEll-being outcomes Systematic review (CHIMES) synthesized evidence for the effectiveness of interventions targeting: subjective wellbeing; mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders; and suicide-related outcomes. Searches were conducted in 16 bibliographic databases and 22 websites between 1990 and 2022. This was supplemented by citation tracking, screening of relevant systematic reviews, and expert recommendation. We identified 35 interventions, with 44 evaluations via randomized controlled trials. Through meta-analyses, we found that interventions have a small beneficial impact on a variety of mental health outcomes in the short term (0-6 months). Interventions improved total social, emotional, and behavioral problems ( = -0.15, 95% CI [-0.28, -0.02]), social-emotional functioning difficulties ( = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.05]), externalizing problem behaviors ( = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.08]), internalizing problem behaviors ( = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.61, -0.08]); and depression and anxiety ( = -0.26, 95% CI [-0.40, -0.13]). Interventions did not demonstrate any effectiveness for outcomes assessed in the longer term (>6 months). Certainty of effectiveness was limited by risk of bias and imprecision. There was limited available evidence for interventions targeting subjective wellbeing and suicide-related outcomes. Future intervention design and delivery must ensure that programs are sufficient to activate causal mechanisms and facilitate change. Evaluation research should use a robust methodology.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020177478.
曾被照料(主要是寄养、亲属照顾或住宿照顾)的儿童和青少年的心理健康和幸福感仍然是公共卫生的重点。有照顾经历的儿童和青少年干预措施以改善心理健康和福祉结局的系统评价(CHIMES)综合了针对以下方面干预措施的有效性证据:主观幸福感;心理、行为和神经发育障碍;以及与自杀相关的结局。1990 年至 2022 年期间,在 16 个文献数据库和 22 个网站上进行了检索。此外,还通过引文追踪、相关系统评价筛选和专家推荐进行了补充。我们确定了 35 项干预措施,其中 44 项通过随机对照试验进行了评估。通过荟萃分析,我们发现干预措施在短期内(0-6 个月)对各种心理健康结局有较小的有益影响。干预措施改善了总社会、情感和行为问题( = -0.15,95%CI [-0.28,-0.02])、社会情感功能困难( = -0.18,95%CI [-0.31,-0.05])、外化问题行为( = -0.30,95%CI [-0.53,-0.08])、内化问题行为( = -0.35,95%CI [-0.61,-0.08])和抑郁和焦虑( = -0.26,95%CI [-0.40,-0.13])。干预措施在长期(>6 个月)评估的结局方面没有显示出任何效果。有效性的确定性受到偏倚风险和不精确性的限制。针对主观幸福感和与自杀相关结局的干预措施的证据有限。未来的干预设计和实施必须确保方案足以激活因果机制并促进变化。评价研究应使用稳健的方法。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020177478。