Suppr超能文献

队列资料简介:“苏格兰受照顾儿童健康”(CHiCS)研究-一个用于比较有照顾经历的儿童和普通人群儿童健康结果的纵向数据集。

Cohort profile: The 'Children's Health in Care in Scotland' (CHiCS) study-a longitudinal dataset to compare health outcomes for care experienced children and general population children.

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 14;11(9):e054664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054664.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Children's Health in Care in Scotland Cohorts were set up to provide first population-wide evidence on the health outcomes of care experienced children (CEC) compared with children in the general population (CGP). To date, there are no data on how objective health outcomes, mortality and pregnancies for CEC are different from CGP in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

The CEC cohort includes school-aged children who were on the 2009/2010 Scottish Government's Children Looked After Statistics (CLAS) return and on the 2009 Pupil Census (PC). The children in the general population cohort includes those who were on the 2009 PC and not on any of the CLAS returns between 1 April 2007 and 31 July 2016.

FINDINGS TO DATE

Data on a variety of health outcomes, including mortality, prescriptions, hospitalisations, pregnancies, and Accident & Emergency attendances, were obtained for the period 1 August 2009 to 31 July 2016 for both cohorts. Data on socioeconomic status (SES) for both cohorts were available from the Birth Registrations and a small area deprivation measure was available from the PC. CEC have, on average, lower SES at birth and live in areas of higher deprivation compared with CGP. A higher proportion of CEC have recorded events across all health data sets, and they experienced higher average rates of mortality, prescriptions and hospitalisations during the study period. The reasons for contacting health services vary between cohorts.

FUTURE PLANS

Age-standardised rates for the two cohorts by sex and area deprivation will be calculated to provide evidence on population-wide prevalence of main causes of death, reasons for hospitalisation and types of prescription. Event history analysis will be used on matched cohorts to investigate the impact of placement histories and socioeconomic factors on health.

摘要

目的

苏格兰儿童保健队列研究旨在提供有关有照护经历的儿童(CEC)与一般人群(CGP)健康结果的首个全人群证据。迄今为止,苏格兰尚无有关 CEC 的客观健康结果、死亡率和妊娠率与 CGP 之间差异的数据。

参与者

CEC 队列包括 2009/2010 年苏格兰政府儿童受照护统计数据(CLAS)和 2009 年学生普查(PC)中在册的学龄儿童。一般人群队列中的儿童包括那些在 2009 年 PC 中在册但在 2007 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 7 月 31 日期间未出现在任何 CLAS 记录中的儿童。

迄今为止的发现

为两个队列获得了 2009 年 8 月 1 日至 2016 年 7 月 31 日期间的各种健康结果数据,包括死亡率、处方、住院、妊娠和急症就诊。两个队列的社会经济地位(SES)数据均来自出生登记处,而来自学生普查的小面积贫困衡量标准。CEC 出生时的 SES 较低,与 CGP 相比,他们居住在贫困程度较高的地区。在所有健康数据集上,CEC 的记录事件比例较高,在研究期间,他们的死亡率、处方和住院率平均较高。两组人群使用卫生服务的原因不同。

未来计划

将按性别和地区贫困程度计算两个队列的年龄标准化率,以提供全人群主要死因、住院原因和处方类型的流行情况证据。将在匹配队列中使用事件历史分析来调查安置历史和社会经济因素对健康的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8049/8442099/663273865e98/bmjopen-2021-054664f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验