Bapuji Raj, Eagles Debra, Ferreira Nathan, Hecht Nathan, Zhang Yuxin, Woo Michael Y, Cheung Warren J, Ly Valentina, Pageau Paul
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
CJEM. 2024 Mar;26(3):188-197. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00663-x. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
Teaching point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) to medical students is resource intensive. Peer-assisted learning, where the teacher can be a medical student, may be a feasible alternative to expert-led learning. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the PoCUS performance assessments of medical students receiving peer-assisted vs expert-led learning.
This study was submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42023383915) and reported with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, Education Source, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing peer-assisted vs expert-led PoCUS teaching for undergraduate medical students. The primary outcome was performance assessment of PoCUS skills. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess study quality. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if mean performance assessment scores with standard deviations and sample sizes were available. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the accuracy score of practical knowledge test for each group. A meta-regression evaluated difference in mean scores.
The search yielded 2890 citations; 1417 unique citations remained after removing duplicates. Nine randomized-controlled studies conducted in Germany, USA, and Israel, with 593 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies assessed teaching of abdominal, cardiac, thoracic, musculoskeletal, and ocular PoCUS skills. Most studies had some risk-of-bias concerns. The estimate accuracy score after weighting is 0.56 (95% CI [0.47, 0.65]) for peer-assisted learning and 0.59 (95% CI [0.49, 0.69]) for expert-led learning. The regression coefficient estimate is 0.0281 (95% CI [- 0.1121, 0.1683]); P value is 0.69.
This meta-analysis found that peer-assisted learning was a reasonable alternative to expert-led learning for teaching PoCUS skills to medical students.
向医学生传授床旁超声检查(PoCUS)需要大量资源。同伴辅助学习(教师可以是医学生)可能是专家主导学习的一种可行替代方案。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较接受同伴辅助学习与专家主导学习的医学生的PoCUS性能评估。
本研究已提交至国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42023383915),并按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行报告。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、教育源数据库、Scopus和科学网,检索时间从建库至2022年11月。纳入标准为比较针对本科医学生的同伴辅助与专家主导的PoCUS教学的研究。主要结局是PoCUS技能的性能评估。两名评价员独立筛选文献并提取数据。采用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。如果有平均性能评估分数及标准差和样本量,则将研究纳入荟萃分析。进行随机效应荟萃分析以估计每组实践知识测试的准确性分数。进行荟萃回归以评估平均分数的差异。
检索共获得2890条文献;去除重复文献后,剩余1417条独特文献。荟萃分析纳入了在德国、美国和以色列开展的9项随机对照研究,共593名参与者。纳入的研究评估了腹部、心脏、胸部、肌肉骨骼和眼部PoCUS技能的教学。大多数研究存在一些偏倚风险问题。同伴辅助学习加权后的估计准确性分数为0.56(95%置信区间[0.47, 0.65]),专家主导学习为0.59(95%置信区间[0.49, 0.69])。回归系数估计值为0.0281(95%置信区间[-0.1121, 0.1683]);P值为0.69。
本荟萃分析发现,在向医学生传授PoCUS技能方面,同伴辅助学习是专家主导学习的合理替代方案。