Chadambuka Cyndirela, Essue Beverley
Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;4(2):e0002919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002919. eCollection 2024.
Gender based violence (GBV) has had distinct and disproportionate impact on the health and wellbeing of migrant women in Canada. Currently, there is dearth of documented information concerning the inclusion of migrant women in GBV-related public policies in Canada. The present study examines the extent to which Canadian public policies reflect and address the needs of migrant women who have experienced GBV. We conducted a policy review of publicly available documents at federal and provincial (British Columbia and Ontario) levels. Migrant women's visibility in the Canadian policy landscape remains limited, as their unique needs are often grouped into broader categories such as 'newcomers, or visible minorities'. This approach fails to acknowledge their distinct lived experiences. Regardless of the federal and provincial efforts in developing policies targeted at GBV prevention, several significant policy gaps came to light. These include the absence of well-defined protective measures for migrant women in precarious employment as well as the hurdles posed by immigration restrictions that pose a significant challenge for those seeking to leave abusive relationships, particularly in cases of dependent migration status. The highlighted policy gaps have negative impact on migrant women's social functioning, including limiting access to services and opportunities, and this has adverse effects on their overall health and wellbeing. To ensure the effectiveness and significance of GBV policies, it is imperative that policymakers acknowledge and target the distinct vulnerabilities and needs of migrant women who experience GBV. The inclusion of an intersectional perspective in the formulation and implementation of policies is essential, as it facilitates the recognition of the distinct needs of migrant women. Failure to acknowledge these varying needs and the real-life experiences of this diverse group can jeopardize the comprehensive and successful implementation of GBV response policies, not only in Canada but also worldwide. Prioritizing this aspect is crucial.
性别暴力对加拿大移民妇女的健康和福祉产生了独特且不成比例的影响。目前,关于加拿大将移民妇女纳入与性别暴力相关公共政策的记录信息匮乏。本研究考察了加拿大公共政策在多大程度上反映并满足了遭受性别暴力的移民妇女的需求。我们对联邦和省级(不列颠哥伦比亚省和安大略省)层面公开可得的文件进行了政策审查。移民妇女在加拿大政策格局中的可见度仍然有限,因为她们的独特需求常常被归入“新移民”或“少数族裔”等更宽泛的类别。这种做法没有认识到她们独特的生活经历。尽管联邦和省级在制定针对性别暴力预防的政策方面做出了努力,但仍发现了一些重大的政策空白。这些空白包括缺乏针对不稳定就业的移民妇女的明确保护措施,以及移民限制带来的障碍,这些障碍对那些试图摆脱虐待关系的人构成了重大挑战,尤其是在依赖移民身份的情况下。突出的政策空白对移民妇女的社会功能产生了负面影响,包括限制她们获得服务和机会,这对她们的整体健康和福祉产生了不利影响。为确保性别暴力政策的有效性和重要性,政策制定者必须认识到并针对遭受性别暴力的移民妇女的独特脆弱性和需求。在政策制定和实施中纳入交叉性视角至关重要,因为这有助于认识到移民妇女的独特需求。不承认这些不同需求以及这一多样化群体的现实生活经历,可能会危及性别暴力应对政策在加拿大乃至全球的全面和成功实施。优先考虑这一方面至关重要。