Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Oct 1;79(10). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae048.
The network approach may provide a framework for understanding intrinsic capacity (IC) as a system's underlying functioning. The system's resilience to resist functional decline may arise from the interrelationships among system components, that is, body functions or capacities. We applied network analysis to investigate whether the interplay between different intrinsic capacities differs according to age and self-rated health (SRH) in older adults.
The study sample consisted of a population-based cohort of community-dwelling older adults aged 75, 80, and 85 years (men n = 356 and women n = 469). We quantified 5 IC domains: vitality, locomotion, cognition, psychology, and sensory, using performance-based measurements and questionnaires, and estimated IC networks for 2 age (75 vs 80 and 85 years) and SRH (higher vs lower) groups separately for sexes. Differences in global network properties (eg, density, overall connectivity) and centrality indices were compared between the groups.
Intrinsic capacity network density (ie, the number of edges) was higher in the 80- and 85-year-olds compared to the 75-year-olds, and in the worse compared to the better SRH group in both sexes. However, the differences in edge weights and global strength of the networks were statistically nonsignificant. Walking speed was the most central node in the estimated networks.
With increasing age and health decline, the IC network seems to become denser, which may indicate a loss of system resilience. Walking is a more complex activity than the others requiring the functioning of many subsystems, which may explain why it connects multiple domains in the IC network.
网络方法可以为理解内在能力(IC)作为系统的基本功能提供一个框架。系统对抵抗功能下降的弹性可能源于系统组件之间的相互关系,即身体功能或能力。我们应用网络分析来研究不同内在能力之间的相互作用是否因年龄和自我报告的健康状况(SRH)而异。
研究样本由一个基于人群的社区居住的 75、80 和 85 岁的老年人队列组成(男性 n=356,女性 n=469)。我们使用基于表现的测量和问卷来量化 5 个内在能力领域:活力、运动、认知、心理和感官,并分别为男性和女性的 2 个年龄(75 岁与 80 岁和 85 岁)和 SRH(较高与较低)组估计内在能力网络。比较了组间整体网络特性(例如,密度、整体连通性)和中心性指数的差异。
内在能力网络密度(即边缘数量)在 80 岁和 85 岁的老年人中高于 75 岁的老年人,在男性和女性中,在自我报告的健康状况较差的组中高于自我报告的健康状况较好的组。然而,网络的边缘权重和全局强度的差异在统计学上没有意义。行走速度是估计网络中最中心的节点。
随着年龄的增长和健康状况的下降,内在能力网络似乎变得更加密集,这可能表明系统弹性的丧失。行走比其他活动更复杂,需要许多子系统的功能,这可能解释了为什么它可以将内在能力网络中的多个领域联系起来。