From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Ghanem, Sabharwal, and Shafiq), and the School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (Covarrubias, and Maxson).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul 1;32(13):e642-e650. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00449. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Web-based resources serve as a fundamental educational platform for orthopaedic trauma patients; however, they are frequently written above the recommended sixth-grade reading level, and previous studies have demonstrated this for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) web-based articles. In this study, we perform an updated assessment of the readability of AAOS trauma-related educational articles as compared with injury-matched education materials developed by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA).
All 46 AAOS trauma-related web-based ( https://www.orthoinfo.org/ ) patient education articles were analyzed for readability. Two independent reviewers used (1) the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and (2) the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) algorithms to calculate the readability level. Mean readability scores were compared across body part categories. A one-sample t -test was done to compare mean FKGL with the recommended sixth-grade readability level and the average American adult reading level. A two-sample t -test was used to compare the readability scores of the AAOS trauma-related articles with those of the OTA.
The average (SD) FKGL and FRE for the AAOS articles were 8.9 (0.74) and 57.2 (5.8), respectively. All articles were written above the sixth-grade reading level. The average readability of the AAOS articles was significantly greater than the recommended sixth-grade reading level ( P < 0.001). The average FKGL and FRE for all AAOS articles were significantly higher compared with those of the OTA articles (8.9 ± 0.74 versus 8.1 ± 1.14, P < 0.001 and 57.2 ± 5.8 versus 65.6 ± 6.6, P < 0.001, respectively). Excellent agreement was observed between raters for the FKGL 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.922 to 0.975) and FRE 0.993 (95% confidence interval, 0.987 to 0.996).
Our findings suggest that after almost a decade, the readability of the AAOS trauma-related articles remains unchanged. The AAOS and OTA trauma patient education materials have high readability levels and may be too difficult for patient comprehension. A need remains to improve the readability of these commonly used trauma education materials.
基于网络的资源是骨科创伤患者的基本教育平台;然而,它们的阅读水平通常高于推荐的六年级阅读水平,之前的研究已经证明了美国骨科医师学会 (AAOS) 基于网络的文章的这一点。在这项研究中,我们对 AAOS 创伤相关教育文章的可读性进行了更新评估,与由骨科创伤协会 (OTA) 开发的损伤匹配的教育材料进行了比较。
分析了所有 46 篇 AAOS 创伤相关的基于网络的(https://www.orthoinfo.org/)患者教育文章的可读性。两位独立的审稿人使用(1)弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)和(2)弗莱什阅读舒适度(FRE)算法来计算可读性水平。按身体部位类别比较平均阅读水平得分。进行单样本 t 检验以比较平均 FKGL 与推荐的六年级阅读水平和美国成年人平均阅读水平。使用两样本 t 检验比较 AAOS 创伤相关文章的可读性得分与 OTA 的可读性得分。
AAOS 文章的平均(SD)FKGL 和 FRE 分别为 8.9(0.74)和 57.2(5.8)。所有文章的阅读水平均高于六年级。AAOS 文章的平均阅读水平明显高于推荐的六年级阅读水平(P<0.001)。所有 AAOS 文章的平均 FKGL 和 FRE 均明显高于 OTA 文章(8.9±0.74 与 8.1±1.14,P<0.001 和 57.2±5.8 与 65.6±6.6,P<0.001)。FKGL 的评分者间一致性极好 0.956(95%置信区间,0.922 至 0.975)和 FRE 0.993(95%置信区间,0.987 至 0.996)。
我们的研究结果表明,近十年后,AAOS 创伤相关文章的可读性保持不变。AAOS 和 OTA 创伤患者教育材料的可读性水平较高,可能对患者理解有难度。仍需要提高这些常用创伤教育材料的可读性。