Suppr超能文献

院前血浆对出血性休克高危患者的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析

The efficacy and safety of pre-hospital plasma in patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Abuelazm Mohamed, Rezq Hazem, Mahmoud Abdelrahman, Tanashat Mohammad, Salah Abdelrahman, Saleh Othman, Morsi Samah, Abdelazeem Basel

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2697-2707. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02461-7. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Plasma is a critical element in hemostatic resuscitation post-injury, and its prompt administration within the prehospital setting may reduce the complications resulting from hemorrhage and shock. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of prehospital plasma infusion in patients susceptible to hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

We conducted our study by aggregating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 29, 2023. Quality assessment was implemented using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Our study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under ID: CRD42023397325.

RESULTS

Three RCTs with 760 individuals were included. There was no difference between plasma infusion and standard care groups in 24-h mortality (P = 0.11), 30-day mortality (P = 0.12), and multiple organ failure incidences (P = 0.20). Plasma infusion was significantly better in the total 24-h volume of PRBC units (P = 0.03) and INR on arrival (P = 0.009). For all other secondary outcomes evaluated (total 24-h volume of packed FFP units, total 24-h volume of platelets units, massive transfusion, vasopressor need during the first 24 h, any adverse event, acute lung injury, transfusion reaction, and sepsis), no significant differences were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Plasma infusion in trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock does not significantly affect mortality or the incidence of multiple organ failure. However, it may lead to reduced packed red blood cell transfusions and increased INR at hospital arrival.

摘要

背景与目的

血浆是创伤后止血复苏的关键要素,在院前环境中及时输注血浆可能会减少出血和休克引起的并发症。我们的目的是评估院前输注血浆对易发生失血性休克患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们通过汇总截至2023年1月29日来自PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane CENTRAL的随机对照试验(RCT)来开展研究。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具进行质量评估。我们的研究方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为:CRD42023397325。

结果

纳入了3项随机对照试验,共760例个体。血浆输注组和标准治疗组在24小时死亡率(P = 0.11)、30天死亡率(P = 0.12)和多器官功能衰竭发生率(P = 0.20)方面没有差异。血浆输注组在24小时内输注的红细胞单位总量(P = 0.03)和入院时的国际标准化比值(INR)(P = 0.009)方面明显更好。对于评估 的所有其他次要结局(24小时内输注的新鲜冰冻血浆单位总量、24小时内输注的血小板单位总量、大量输血、最初24小时内对血管升压药的需求、任何不良事件、急性肺损伤、输血反应和败血症),两组之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

对有失血性休克风险的创伤患者输注血浆不会显著影响死亡率或多器官功能衰竭的发生率。然而,它可能会导致入院时输注的红细胞减少以及国际标准化比值升高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49f/11666795/e877ede2207a/68_2024_2461_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验