Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Radiology), Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3007-3020. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07362-6. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
One of the goals of this systematic review is to provide a meta-analysis-derived mean OEF of healthy volunteers. Another aim of this study is to indicate the OEF ranges of various neurological pathologies. Potential clinical applications of OEF metrics are presented. Peer-reviewed studies reporting OEF metrics derived from computed tomography (CT)/positron emission tomography (PET) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were considered. Databases utilized included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system was used for evaluating studies. R Studio was utilized for the meta-analysis calculations when appropriate. The GRADE framework was utilized to assess additional findings. Of 2267 potential studies, 165 met the inclusion criteria. The healthy volunteer meta-analysis included 339 subjects and found a mean OEF value of 38.87 (37.38, 40.36), with a prediction interval of 32.40-45.34. There were no statistical differences in OEF values derived from PET versus MRI. We provided a GRADE A certainty rating for the use of OEF metrics to predict stroke occurrence in patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease. We provided a GRADE B certainty rating for monitoring treatment response in Moyamoya disease. Use of OEF metrics in diagnosing and/or monitoring other conditions had a GRADE C certainty rating or less. OEF might have a role in diagnosing and monitoring patients with symptomatic carotid or cerebral vessel disease and Moyamoya disease. While we found insufficient evidence to support measuring OEF metrics in other patient populations, in many cases, further studies are warranted.
本系统评价的目的之一是提供健康志愿者的荟萃分析衍生的平均 OEF。本研究的另一个目的是指出各种神经病理学的 OEF 范围。还介绍了 OEF 指标的潜在临床应用。考虑了报告从计算机断层扫描(CT)/正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和/或磁共振成像(MRI)得出的 OEF 指标的经过同行评审的研究。使用的数据库包括 MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华评分系统评估研究。当适当时,使用 R Studio 进行荟萃分析计算。使用 GRADE 框架评估其他发现。在 2267 项潜在研究中,有 165 项符合纳入标准。健康志愿者荟萃分析包括 339 名受试者,发现平均 OEF 值为 38.87(37.38,40.36),预测区间为 32.40-45.34。从 PET 与 MRI 得出的 OEF 值没有统计学差异。我们对使用 OEF 指标预测有症状颈动脉或脑血管疾病患者中风发生的情况给予 GRADE A 确定性评级。我们对监测烟雾病治疗反应给予 GRADE B 确定性评级。在诊断和/或监测其他疾病中使用 OEF 指标的情况,其 GRADE 确定性评级为 C 或更低。OEF 可能在诊断和监测有症状颈动脉或脑血管疾病和烟雾病患者方面发挥作用。虽然我们发现没有足够的证据支持在其他患者人群中测量 OEF 指标,但在许多情况下,仍需要进一步研究。