Cheng Zicheng, Fu Fangwang, Lian Yizhi, Zhan Zhenxiang, Zhang Wenyuan
Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
J Affect Disord. 2024 May 1;352:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.054. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
The aim was to ascertain whether low-carbohydrate-diet (LCD) score and dietary macronutrient intake are associated with depression.
This cross-sectional study included 23,204 United States adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018. Dietary macronutrient intake was evaluated by the average of two 24-h dietary recall interviews. LCD score was calculated by summing the 11 quantiles values of the percentages of energy derived from carbohydrate, protein, and fat. Major depression was defined as a nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire score of 10 or more. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to explore the relationship between LCD score, dietary macronutrient intake, and depression.
LCD score was significantly associated with the risk of depression after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio, 0.98; 95 % confidence interval, 0.97-0.99; p < 0.001). Restricted cubic splines showed that the pattern of this inverse association was nonlinear. Among macronutrients, carbohydrate and protein intake was nonlinearly associated with the risk of depression, whereas fat intake was not related to the risk of depression. A decreased risk of depression was observed when the carbohydrate intake was moderate (45.3 %-59.1 %). The pattern of the association between protein intake and the risk of depression was L-shaped.
LCD score was inversely associated with the risk of depression in a nonlinear manner in a nationally representative sample of adults from the United States. Furthermore, moderate carbohydrate intake and high protein intake were correlated with a lower risk of depression.
目的是确定低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)评分和膳食常量营养素摄入量是否与抑郁症有关。
这项横断面研究纳入了2005 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中的23204名美国成年人。通过两次24小时膳食回顾访谈的平均值来评估膳食常量营养素摄入量。LCD评分通过将碳水化合物、蛋白质和脂肪所提供能量百分比的11个分位数的值相加来计算。重度抑郁症定义为患者健康问卷九项得分达到10分或更高。采用逻辑回归和受限立方样条模型来探讨LCD评分、膳食常量营养素摄入量与抑郁症之间的关系。
在对协变量进行调整后,LCD评分与抑郁症风险显著相关(比值比,0.98;95%置信区间,0.97 - 0.99;p < 0.001)。受限立方样条显示这种负相关模式是非线性的。在常量营养素中,碳水化合物和蛋白质摄入量与抑郁症风险呈非线性相关,而脂肪摄入量与抑郁症风险无关。当碳水化合物摄入量适中(45.3% - 59.1%)时,抑郁症风险降低。蛋白质摄入量与抑郁症风险之间的关联模式呈L形。
在美国具有全国代表性的成年人样本中,LCD评分与抑郁症风险呈非线性负相关。此外,适度的碳水化合物摄入量和高蛋白摄入量与较低的抑郁症风险相关。