Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建翻修术后残留前膝松弛与较差预后的相关性

Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction.

作者信息

Eggeling Lena, Drenck Tobias Claus, Breer Stephan, Frosch Karl-Heinz, Akoto Ralph

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sports Traumatology, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Asklepios St. Georg Clinic, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 14;12(2):23259671231219695. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219695. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relationship between remaining anterior knee laxity and poorer clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be underrated, and the criteria for failure of revision ACLR have not been defined.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate a possible association between remaining knee laxity and functional scores in patients after revision ACLR. We hypothesized that a postoperative side-to-side-difference (SSD) in knee laxity of ≥6 mm will be an objective parameter for failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients (77 women and 123 men; mean age, 30.8 ± 11 years; range, 18-61 years) who underwent revision ACLR between 2016 and 2019 were evaluated; The mean follow-up period was 30.2 ± 9 months (range, 24-67 months). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to postoperative SSD (<3 mm, 3-5 mm, or ≥6 mm). Preoperative and postoperative outcome measures (Lachman, pivot shift, visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients, 74% (n = 148) had a postoperative SSD of <3 mm at the latest follow-up, 19.5% (n = 39) had a postoperative SSD of 3 to 5 mm, and 6.5% (n = 13) had a postoperative SSD of ≥6 mm. Patients in all groups saw significant pre- to postoperative reductions in positive Lachman and pivot-shift tests as well as significant improvements in VAS pain, Lysholm, and Tegner scores ( < .001 for all). All postoperative functional scores of the patients with SSDs of <3 mm and 3-5 mm were significantly increased compared with those of patients with an SSD of ≥6 mm (≤ .01 for all).

CONCLUSION

In patients following revision ACLR, anterior and rotational knee laxity were successfully reduced while increasing postoperative functional outcomes. A remaining postoperative SSD of ≥6 mm was associated with inferior patient outcomes compared with an SSD <6 mm. An SSD of ≥6 mm represents an objective parameter in the definition of failure of revision ACLR.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后残留的前膝关节松弛与较差的临床结果之间的关系可能被低估,且翻修ACLR失败的标准尚未明确。

目的/假设:评估翻修ACLR术后患者残留膝关节松弛与功能评分之间的可能关联。我们假设术后膝关节松弛的左右侧差异(SSD)≥6 mm将是失败的一个客观参数。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

对2016年至2019年间接受翻修ACLR的200例患者(77例女性和123例男性;平均年龄30.8±11岁;范围18 - 61岁)进行评估;平均随访期为30.2±9个月(范围24 - 67个月)。根据术后SSD(<3 mm、3 - 5 mm或≥6 mm)将患者分为3组。比较各组术前和术后的结果指标(Lachman试验、轴移试验、疼痛视觉模拟量表[VAS]、Tegner活动水平评分、Lysholm膝关节评分、国际膝关节文献委员会评分以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分)。

结果

在200例患者中,74%(n = 148)在最近一次随访时术后SSD<3 mm,19.5%(n = 39)术后SSD为3至5 mm,6.5%(n = 13)术后SSD≥6 mm。所有组患者术前至术后阳性Lachman试验和轴移试验均显著减少,VAS疼痛评分、Lysholm评分和Tegner评分均显著改善(所有P<0.001)。与SSD≥6 mm的患者相比,SSD<3 mm和3 - 5 mm的患者所有术后功能评分均显著提高(所有P≤0.01)。

结论

在翻修ACLR术后的患者中,膝关节前向和旋转松弛得到成功减轻,同时术后功能结果得到改善。与SSD<6 mm相比,术后残留SSD≥6 mm与患者较差的结果相关。SSD≥6 mm代表了翻修ACLR失败定义中的一个客观参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6d/10870811/fa0c7944b7d2/10.1177_23259671231219695-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 14;12(2):23259671231219695. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219695. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5059-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on 6-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):2865-2872. doi: 10.1177/0363546518793881. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
[Effectiveness of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction for revision].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 15;35(3):330-336. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202010044.

本文引用的文献

2
Lower Failure Rates and Improved Patient Outcome Due to Reconstruction of the MCL and Revision ACL Reconstruction in Chronic Medial Knee Instability.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Mar 15;9(3):2325967121989312. doi: 10.1177/2325967121989312. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Effect of Graft Rupture Prevention Training on Young Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An 8-Year Prospective Intervention Study.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 28;9(1):2325967120973593. doi: 10.1177/2325967120973593. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2415-2434. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Treatment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):2325967120931097. doi: 10.1177/2325967120931097. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for failure of revision ACL reconstruction.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2458-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06133-y. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验