Suppr超能文献

验证一种单次方案来确定深蹲练习的负荷-速度曲线和 1 次重复最大值。

Validation of a Single-Session Protocol to Determine the Load-Velocity Profile and One-Repetition Maximum for the Back Squat Exercise.

机构信息

Neuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, Lisbon, Portugal; and.

CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada, Dafundo, Portugal.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):1013-1018. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004749. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

Abstract

Gomes, M, Fitas, A, Santos, P, Pezarat-Correia, P, and Mendonca, GV. Validation of a single session protocol to determine the load-velocity profile and one-repetition maximum for the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 38(6): 1013-1018, 2024-We investigated whether a single session of absolute incremental loading is valid to obtain the individual load-velocity profile (LVP) and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the free-weight parallel back squat. Twenty strength-trained male subjects completed 3 testing sessions, including a baseline 1RM session and 2 LVP sessions (LVP rel based on incremental relative loads and LVP abs based on absolute load increments until 1RM). The 1RM load was compared between the baseline and LVP abs . The load at zero velocity (load-axis intercept [L 0 ]), maximal velocity capacity (velocity-axis intercept [V 0 ]), slope, and area under the load-velocity relationship line (A line ) were compared between the LVP rel and LVP abs using equivalence testing through 2 one-sided t -tests. Measurement accuracy was calculated using the absolute percent error. The 1RM measured at baseline and LVP abs was equivalent and presented a low absolute percent error (1.2%). The following LVP parameters were equivalent between LVP rel and LVP abs : 1RM, L 0 , and A line because the mean difference between sessions was close to zero and the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (1RM:5.3 kg; L 0 :6.8 kg; A line : 9.5 kg·m -1 ·s -1 ) were contained within the a priori defined ± equivalent margins (5% for 1RM and L 0 and 10% for A line ). The aforementioned variables presented a low absolute percent error. However, slope and V 0 were not equivalent between sessions. In conclusion, a single session of absolute incremental loading is a valid approach to obtain the L 0 and A line of the individual LVP and 1RM, and can be used to efficiently track the magnitude of neuromuscular adaptations throughout the training cycles for the free-weight back squat.

摘要

戈麦斯、Fitas、A、桑托斯、P、佩扎拉特-科雷亚、P 和门东萨、GV。验证单次递增负荷方案以确定自由重量深蹲的负荷-速度曲线和 1 次重复最大重量。J 力量与体能研究 38(6):1013-1018,2024-我们研究了单次绝对递增负荷是否有效,以获得自由重量平行深蹲的个体负荷-速度曲线(LVP)和 1 次重复最大重量(1RM)。20 名力量训练男性受试者完成了 3 次测试,包括基线 1RM 测试和 2 次 LVP 测试(基于递增相对负荷的 LVP rel 和基于 1RM 直至 1RM 的绝对负荷增量的 LVP abs)。将基线和 LVP abs 之间的 1RM 负荷进行比较。通过 2 个单边 t 检验的等效性检验,比较 LVP rel 和 LVP abs 之间的零速度负荷(负荷轴截距[L 0 ])、最大速度能力(速度轴截距[V 0 ])、斜率和负荷-速度关系线下的面积(A 线)。使用绝对百分比误差计算测量精度。基线和 LVP abs 测量的 1RM 等效,且绝对百分比误差较低(1.2%)。LVP rel 和 LVP abs 之间的以下 LVP 参数等效:1RM、L 0 和 A 线,因为两次测试之间的平均差异接近零,且 Bland-Altman 一致性界限(1RM:5.3kg;L 0 :6.8kg;A 线:9.5kg·m -1 ·s -1 )包含在预先定义的±等效范围内(1RM 和 L 0 为 5%,A 线为 10%)。上述变量的绝对百分比误差较低。然而,斜率和 V 0 两次测试之间不相等。结论:单次绝对递增负荷是获得个体 LVP 和 1RM 的 L 0 和 A 线的有效方法,可用于有效跟踪自由重量深蹲整个训练周期中神经肌肉适应的程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验