Suppr超能文献

负重带对卧推练习中最大神经肌肉能力和 1 次重复最大值预测的影响。

The Effect of Lifting Straps on the Prediction of the Maximal Neuromuscular Capabilities and 1 Repetition Maximum During the Prone Bench Pull Exercise.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; and.

Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Nov 1;38(11):e638-e644. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004894.

Abstract

Miras-Moreno, S and García-Ramos, A. The effect of lifting straps on the prediction of the maximal neuromuscular capabilities and 1 repetition maximum during the prone bench pull exercise. J Strength Cond Res 38(11): e638-e644, 2024-This study examined the effects of using lifting straps in the prone bench pull exercise on (a) the magnitude of the load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables (load-axis intercept, velocity-axis intercept, and area under the L-V relationship line) and (b) the accuracy of the L-V relationship in predicting the 1 repetition maximum (1RM). In a counterbalanced sequence, 20 resistance-trained male subjects performed 2 identical experimental sessions, 1 with and 1 without lifting straps. During each session, subjects sequentially lifted 4 loads (14 kg, 85% 1RM, and 2 intermediate loads), followed by 1RM attempts. The L-V relationship was modelled using both multiple-point (4 loads) and 2-point (14 kg-85% 1RM) methods, whereas 3 types of minimal velocity thresholds (MVT) were used for 1RM prediction: (a) general MVT (averaged across the subjects velocity of the 1RM trial), (b) individual MVT (individual velocity of the 1RM trial), and (c) average optimal MVT (averaged across the subjects velocity that eliminates the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM). Irrespective of lifting straps use, which had no impact on the L-V relationship or the accuracy of 1RM prediction, we observed: (a) greater L-V relationship variables when obtained by the 2-point method compared with the multiple-point method (p < 0.001; effect size range = 0.353-0.639) and (b) the lowest absolute errors (<4.0 kg) in 1RM prediction for the 2-point method combined with the average optimal MVT (p < 0.001). These results reinforce the 2-point method applied in field conditions and the average optimal MVT for the routine testing of the L-V relationship.

摘要

米拉-莫雷诺和加西亚-拉莫斯研究了在俯姿卧推练习中使用举重带对以下方面的影响:(a) 负荷-速度 (L-V) 关系变量的大小(负荷轴截距、速度轴截距和 L-V 关系线下的面积)和 (b) L-V 关系预测 1 重复最大重量 (1RM) 的准确性。在一项平衡的序列中,20 名受过阻力训练的男性受试者进行了 2 次完全相同的实验,1 次使用举重带,1 次不使用举重带。在每次实验中,受试者依次举起 4 个负荷(14 公斤、85%1RM 和 2 个中间负荷),然后进行 1RM 尝试。使用多点 (4 个负荷) 和两点 (14 公斤-85%1RM) 方法对 L-V 关系进行建模,而对于 1RM 预测,使用了 3 种最小速度阈值 (MVT):(a) 一般 MVT(所有受试者 1RM 试验速度的平均值),(b) 个体 MVT(个体 1RM 试验速度),以及 (c) 平均最佳 MVT(所有受试者消除了实际和预测 1RM 之间差异的速度的平均值)。无论是否使用举重带,它们对 L-V 关系或 1RM 预测的准确性都没有影响,我们观察到:(a) 与多点法相比,两点法获得的 L-V 关系变量更大(p<0.001;效应量范围=0.353-0.639)和 (b) 两点法与平均最佳 MVT 结合使用时,1RM 预测的绝对误差最小(<4.0 公斤)(p<0.001)。这些结果加强了现场条件下的两点法和平均最佳 MVT 对 L-V 关系常规测试的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验