Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Country, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pain Education Unit, Sydney Medical School-Northern, The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Guringai and Dharug Country, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2024 Feb;30. doi: 10.1071/PY23164.
The Internet is a widely used source of health information, yet the accuracy of online information can be low. This is the case for low back pain (LBP), where much of the information about LBP treatment is poor.
This research conducted a content analysis to explore what pain treatments for LBP are presented to the public on websites of Australian pain clinics listed in the PainAustralia National Pain Services Directory. Websites providing information relevant to the treatment of LBP were included. Details of the treatments for LBP offered by each pain service were extracted.
In total, 173 pain services were included, with these services linking to 100 unique websites. Services were predominantly under private ownership and located in urban areas, with limited services in non-urban locations. Websites provided detail on a median of six (IQR 3-8) treatments, with detail on a higher number of treatments provided by services in the private sector. Physical, psychological and educational treatments were offered by the majority of pain services, whereas surgical and workplace-focused treatments were offered by relatively few services. Most services provided details on multidisciplinary care; however, interdisciplinary, coordinated care characterised by case-conferencing was infrequently mentioned.
Most websites provided details on treatments that were largely in-line with recommended care for LBP, but some were not, especially in private clinics. However, whether the information provided online is a true reflection of the services offered in clinics remains to be investigated.
互联网是一个广泛使用的健康信息来源,但在线信息的准确性可能较低。这种情况在腰痛(LBP)中尤为明显,因为关于 LBP 治疗的大部分信息都很差。
本研究进行了内容分析,以探讨澳大利亚疼痛诊所协会(PainAustralia)国家疼痛服务目录中列出的澳大利亚疼痛诊所的网站向公众提供了哪些腰痛治疗信息。纳入了提供与腰痛治疗相关信息的网站。从每个疼痛服务中提取了腰痛治疗方法的详细信息。
共纳入了 173 个疼痛服务,这些服务链接到 100 个独特的网站。服务主要由私人所有,位于城市地区,非城市地区的服务有限。网站提供了中位数为 6(IQR 3-8)种治疗方法的详细信息,私营部门服务提供的治疗方法数量更多。大多数疼痛服务提供了物理、心理和教育治疗,但很少有服务提供手术和以工作场所为重点的治疗。大多数服务提供了多学科护理的详细信息;然而,以病例会议为特征的跨学科、协调护理很少被提及。
大多数网站提供的治疗方法信息在很大程度上与腰痛的推荐护理一致,但也有一些不一致,尤其是在私人诊所。然而,在线提供的信息是否真实反映了诊所提供的服务仍有待调查。