• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物伦理服务在儿科重症监护病房中的作用:一项定性描述性研究。

The role of bioethics services in paediatric intensive care units: a qualitative descriptive study.

作者信息

Alexander Denise, Quirke Mary, Greene Jo, Cassidy Lorna, Hilliard Carol, Brenner Maria

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01017-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01017-z
PMID:38374022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877773/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is considerable variation in the functionality of bioethical services in different institutions and countries for children in hospital, despite new challenges due to increasing technology supports for children with serious illness and medical complexity. We aimed to understand how bioethics services address bioethical concerns that are increasingly encountered in paediatric intensive care.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was used to describe clinician's perspectives on the functionality of clinical bioethics services for paediatric intensive care units. Clinicians who were members of formal or informal clinical bioethics groups, or who were closely involved with the process of working through ethically challenging decisions, were interviewed. Interviews took place online. Resulting transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

From 33 interviews, we identified four themes that described the functionality of bioethics services when a child requires technology to sustain life: striving for consensus; the importance of guidelines; a structure that facilitates a time-sensitive and relevant response; and strong leadership and teamwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical bioethics services have the potential to expand their role due to the challenges brought by advancing medical technology and the increasing options it brings for treatment. Further work is needed to identify where and how bioethics services can evolve and adapt to fully address the needs of the decision-makers in PICU.

摘要

背景

尽管针对患有严重疾病和医疗复杂性的儿童的技术支持不断增加带来了新的挑战,但不同机构和国家为住院儿童提供的生物伦理服务功能存在很大差异。我们旨在了解生物伦理服务如何应对儿科重症监护中日益常见的生物伦理问题。

方法

采用定性描述性设计来描述临床医生对儿科重症监护病房临床生物伦理服务功能的看法。对正式或非正式临床生物伦理小组的成员,或密切参与处理具有伦理挑战性决策过程的临床医生进行了访谈。访谈通过网络进行。使用主题分析法对所得的访谈记录进行分析。

结果

通过33次访谈,我们确定了四个主题,描述了在儿童需要技术维持生命时生物伦理服务的功能:争取达成共识;指南的重要性;有助于及时做出相关回应的架构;以及强有力的领导和团队合作。

结论

由于先进医疗技术带来的挑战及其带来的更多治疗选择,临床生物伦理服务有扩大其作用的潜力。需要进一步开展工作,以确定生物伦理服务在何处以及如何发展和适应,从而充分满足儿科重症监护病房决策者的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff57/10877773/06a46167407f/12910_2024_1017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff57/10877773/06a46167407f/12910_2024_1017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff57/10877773/06a46167407f/12910_2024_1017_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of bioethics services in paediatric intensive care units: a qualitative descriptive study.生物伦理服务在儿科重症监护病房中的作用:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01017-z.
2
Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians' perspectives of bioethical considerations.儿科重症监护中的技术决定论:临床医生对生物伦理考虑的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 28;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6.
3
The Meaning Given to Bioethics as a Source of Support by Physicians Who Care for Children Who Require Long-Term Ventilation.将生物伦理学视为支持长期需要通气治疗的儿童的医生的资源的意义。
Qual Health Res. 2022 May;32(6):916-928. doi: 10.1177/10497323221083744. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study.儿科重症监护病房中患有危及生命疾病的儿童的父母在临终关怀决策方面的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e028548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028548.
5
[Limitation of therapeutic effort in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: Bioethical knowledge and attitudes of the medical profession].[儿科重症监护病房治疗努力的局限性:医学专业人员的生物伦理知识与态度]
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016 Mar-Apr;87(2):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.10.002. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
6
Nurses' perceptions of working with families in the paediatric intensive care unit.护士在儿科重症监护病房中与家庭合作的看法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jul;22(4):195-202. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12142. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
Relationships, trust, decision-making and quality of care in a paediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中的人际关系、信任、决策与护理质量。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep;35(9):1593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1551-z. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
8
Mother-nurse decision making practices for children with complex health care needs receiving homecare services: A qualitative descriptive study.为接受家庭护理服务的有复杂医疗需求儿童的母婴决策实践:一项质性描述性研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2022 Jul;48(4):605-612. doi: 10.1111/cch.12966. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.
2
Navigating healthcare decision-making for children requiring life-sustaining medical treatment in Ireland: exploring clinician perspectives through the lens of the Irish legal system.为爱尔兰需要维持生命的医疗救治的儿童进行医疗决策:从爱尔兰法律体系的视角探索临床医生的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jun 6;26(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01237-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery.生命伦理学、临床伦理委员会与儿童对心脏手术的同意
Clin Ethics. 2022 Sep;17(3):272-281. doi: 10.1177/14777509211034145. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Physicians' decision-making when managing pediatric patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: A qualitative study.医生在管理患有长时间意识障碍的儿科患者时的决策:一项定性研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Aug;29(8):2181-2191. doi: 10.1111/ene.15354. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
The Meaning Given to Bioethics as a Source of Support by Physicians Who Care for Children Who Require Long-Term Ventilation.
将生物伦理学视为支持长期需要通气治疗的儿童的医生的资源的意义。
Qual Health Res. 2022 May;32(6):916-928. doi: 10.1177/10497323221083744. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Raqeeb, Haastrup, and Evans: Seeking Consistency through a Distributive Justice-Based Approach to Limitation of Treatment in the Context of Dispute.拉格比、哈斯卓普和埃文斯:在争议背景下,通过基于分配正义的治疗限制方法寻求一致性。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(1):169-180. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.21.
5
Conflicts between parents and clinicians: Tracheotomy decisions and clinical bioethics consultation.父母与临床医生之间的冲突:气管切开术决策和临床伦理咨询。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 May;29(3):685-695. doi: 10.1177/09697330211023986. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Initiating technology dependence to sustain a child's life: a systematic review of reasons.启动技术依赖以维持儿童生命:原因的系统评价。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1068-1075. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107099. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Perceptions of important outcomes of moral case deliberations: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in childhood cancer care.对道德案例审议重要结果的认知:一项针对儿童癌症护理领域医护人员的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 17;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00597-4.
8
Relational, Emotional, and Pragmatic Attributes of Ethics Consultations at a Children's Hospital.儿童医院伦理咨询的关系、情感和实用属性。
Pediatrics. 2021 Apr;147(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1087. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
The Motion of the Italian National Bioethics Committee on Aggressive Treatment towards Children with Limited Life Expectancy.意大利国家生物伦理委员会关于对预期寿命有限的儿童进行积极治疗的动议。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):448. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040448.
10
Getting the Balance Right: Medical Futility, Scientific Advancement, and the Role of Law.把握平衡:医学无效性、科学进步与法律的作用。
Med Law Rev. 2020 Aug 1;28(3):573-594. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa011.