• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。

Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Dahò Margherita

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed. 15, 90128 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.

DOI:10.3390/bs15060748
PMID:40564530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12189864/
Abstract

Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs' well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs' effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.

摘要

将临床伦理顾问(CEC)纳入医疗保健体系需要了解他们如何在应对伦理审议中的认知和情感挑战时应用生物伦理知识。伦理咨询往往会引发强烈的情感,但它们对决策的影响仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过一项半结构化调查,探究了来自美国和10个欧洲国家的52名临床伦理顾问的情感反应。参与者选择了一个他们遇到的真实伦理案例,并描述了他们在审议过程中和审议后的情感反应。研究结果显示,近77%的临床伦理顾问在审议过程中经历了诸如沮丧、悲伤或愤怒等负面情绪,而21%的人报告了中性或积极的情绪。尽管审议后满意度和宽慰感有所增加,但负面情绪往往仍然存在。此外,45%的参与者报告了不足感或懊悔感,12%的人对自己的决定表示不确定,5%的人表示事后会改变自己的决定。负面情绪的积累可能会影响临床伦理顾问的幸福感和判断力,凸显了提供结构化支持的必要性。应对认知和情感需求对于维持临床伦理顾问的有效性至关重要,这强调了有针对性的培训项目和支持策略对于在高风险医疗环境中加强伦理决策和恢复力的重要性。

相似文献

1
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.
2
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Patient and Public Perceptions of 3D Technologies (Models and Images) to Facilitate Health Care Consultations: Exploratory, Mixed Methods Study.患者及公众对用于辅助医疗咨询的3D技术(模型和图像)的认知:探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 18;9:e65235. doi: 10.2196/65235.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
10
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Social Relationships Influence Moral Judgment? A Cross-Cultural Examination.社会关系会影响道德判断吗?一项跨文化研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;15(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/bs15081097.
2
Permissibility, Moral Emotions, and Perceived Moral Agency in Autonomous Driving Dilemmas: An Investigation of Pedestrian-Sacrifice and Driver-Sacrifice Scenarios in the Third-Person Perspective.自动驾驶困境中的可允许性、道德情感与感知到的道德能动性:从第三人称视角对行人牺牲和驾驶员牺牲场景的调查
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(8):1038. doi: 10.3390/bs15081038.
3
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials.陪审员很少会对他们喜欢的人做出不利裁决:民事审判中对被告的情感、对案件事实的理解与陪审员判决之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(7):965. doi: 10.3390/bs15070965.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Barriers to Inclusivity: Systematic Analysis of Exclusion Criteria and Potential Bias in Clinical Cancer Trials for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions in European Protocols.探索包容性障碍:对欧洲方案中精神和神经疾病临床癌症试验的排除标准及潜在偏倚的系统分析
Psychooncology. 2025 May;34(5):e70182. doi: 10.1002/pon.70182.
2
Guilt emotion and decision-making under uncertainty.内疚情绪与不确定性下的决策
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1518752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1518752. eCollection 2025.
3
Decision-Making Styles in Medical Students and Healthcare Professionals: The Roles of Personality Traits and Socio-Emotional Intelligence Factors.医学生和医疗保健专业人员的决策风格:人格特质和社会情绪智力因素的作用
J Psychol. 2025;159(2):71-91. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2024.2369618. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Emergency Department Boarding of a Teen Requiring Complex Care: How Should an Ethics Consultant Respond?需要复杂护理的青少年在急诊科滞留:伦理顾问应如何应对?
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Jul;24(7):132-134. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2354139. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
The role of bioethics services in paediatric intensive care units: a qualitative descriptive study.生物伦理服务在儿科重症监护病房中的作用:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01017-z.
6
ICU triage decisions and biases about time and identity.重症监护室分诊决策中的时间和身份偏见。
Bioethics. 2023 Sep;37(7):662-667. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13190. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Biases in bioethics: a narrative review.生物伦理学中的偏见:叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0.
8
The "Ladder of Inference" as a Conflict Management Tool: Working with the "Difficult" Patient or Family in Healthcare Ethics Consultations.作为冲突管理工具的“推理阶梯”:在医疗伦理咨询中与“难缠”的患者或家属打交道
HEC Forum. 2024 Mar;36(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09476-w. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
An Exploration of the Emotive Experiences and the Representations of Female Care Providers Working in a Perinatal Hospice. A Pilot Qualitative Study.围产期临终关怀中女性护理人员的情感体验与表现探索。一项定性试点研究。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Feb;18(1):55-64. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210105.
10
Reducing Probability Overestimation of Threatening Events: An Italian Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Techniques in Non-Clinical Subjects.降低对威胁性事件的概率高估:一项关于认知技术在非临床受试者中疗效的意大利研究。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2019 Jun;16(3):149-155.