Suppr超能文献

临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。

Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Dahò Margherita

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed. 15, 90128 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.

Abstract

Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs' well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs' effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.

摘要

将临床伦理顾问(CEC)纳入医疗保健体系需要了解他们如何在应对伦理审议中的认知和情感挑战时应用生物伦理知识。伦理咨询往往会引发强烈的情感,但它们对决策的影响仍未得到充分探索。本研究通过一项半结构化调查,探究了来自美国和10个欧洲国家的52名临床伦理顾问的情感反应。参与者选择了一个他们遇到的真实伦理案例,并描述了他们在审议过程中和审议后的情感反应。研究结果显示,近77%的临床伦理顾问在审议过程中经历了诸如沮丧、悲伤或愤怒等负面情绪,而21%的人报告了中性或积极的情绪。尽管审议后满意度和宽慰感有所增加,但负面情绪往往仍然存在。此外,45%的参与者报告了不足感或懊悔感,12%的人对自己的决定表示不确定,5%的人表示事后会改变自己的决定。负面情绪的积累可能会影响临床伦理顾问的幸福感和判断力,凸显了提供结构化支持的必要性。应对认知和情感需求对于维持临床伦理顾问的有效性至关重要,这强调了有针对性的培训项目和支持策略对于在高风险医疗环境中加强伦理决策和恢复力的重要性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Guilt emotion and decision-making under uncertainty.内疚情绪与不确定性下的决策
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1518752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1518752. eCollection 2025.
6
ICU triage decisions and biases about time and identity.重症监护室分诊决策中的时间和身份偏见。
Bioethics. 2023 Sep;37(7):662-667. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13190. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Biases in bioethics: a narrative review.生物伦理学中的偏见:叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验