• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adult perceptions of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: A Pakistan focus group study.成人对香烟和电子烟的认知:一项以巴基斯坦为重点的焦点小组研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 22;38:102619. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102619. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes.消费者如何看待不同尼古丁产品的风险差异?对无烟烟草、电子烟、尼古丁替代疗法和可燃香烟的相对风险认知的综述。
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e49-e58. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053060. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Vaping characteristics and expectancies are associated with smoking cessation propensity among dual users of combustible and electronic cigarettes.同时使用可燃香烟和电子烟的双重使用者中,蒸气特征和预期与戒烟意愿相关。
Addiction. 2019 May;114(5):896-906. doi: 10.1111/add.14551. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
Clinical study protocol on electronic cigarettes and nicotine pouches for smoking cessation in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial.电子香烟和尼古丁袋在巴基斯坦戒烟的临床研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07876-y.
5
E-Cigarettes Use Behavior and Experience of Adults: Qualitative Research Findings to Inform E-Cigarette Use Measure Development.成年人的电子烟使用行为与体验:为电子烟使用测量方法开发提供信息的定性研究结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):190-196. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw175. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Harm perceptions of nicotine-containing products and associated sources of information in UK adults with and without mental ill health: A cross-sectional survey.具有和不具有精神健康问题的英国成年人对含尼古丁产品的危害认知及其相关信息来源:一项横断面调查。
Addiction. 2022 Mar;117(3):715-729. doi: 10.1111/add.15657. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
7
Youth's engagement and perceptions of disposable e-cigarettes: a UK focus group study.青年对一次性电子烟的参与度和认知:英国焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):e068466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068466.
8
E-cigarettes, Hookah Pens and Vapes: Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.电子烟、水烟笔和蒸汽烟:青少年和青年对电子尼古丁传送系统的认知
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Oct;18(10):2006-12. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw095. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
E-cigarette use in adults: a qualitative study of users' perceptions and future use intentions.成人使用电子烟:关于使用者认知及未来使用意图的定性研究
Addict Res Theory. 2016;24(4):313-321. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2016.1139700. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Vaping patterns, nicotine dependence and reasons for vaping among American Indian dual users of cigarettes and electronic cigarettes.美国印第安香烟和电子烟双重使用者的吸烟模式、尼古丁依赖程度和电子烟使用原因。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7523-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and determinants of e-cigarette use in South Asia: a systematic review.南亚电子烟使用情况及影响因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Sep 3;10(9):e018363. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018363.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco control policies in the 21st century: achievements and open challenges.21 世纪的烟草控制政策:成就与未竟之挑战。
Mol Oncol. 2021 Mar;15(3):744-752. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12918. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Tobacco harm reduction: Past history, current controversies and a proposed approach for the future.烟草危害降低:过去的历史、当前的争议以及未来的建议方法。
Prev Med. 2020 Nov;140:106099. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106099. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.哪些因素会影响饱和度?焦点小组研究中的样本量估计。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Support for Patients Who Have Difficulty Quitting Smoking: A Review.对戒烟困难患者的支持:一项综述
Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;58(3):317-320. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1111-18. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Electronic cigarettes use and perception amongst medical students: a cross sectional survey from Sindh, Pakistan.巴基斯坦信德省医学生对电子烟的使用与认知:一项横断面调查
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Mar 22;11(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3303-z.
6
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
7
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
8
Smoking cessation intervention: an evidence-based approach.戒烟干预:基于证据的方法。
Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):74-82. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.03.2124.
9
Clearing the smoke: the science base for tobacco harm reduction--executive summary.拨开迷雾:烟草危害降低的科学依据——执行摘要
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):189-95. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.189.

成人对香烟和电子烟的认知:一项以巴基斯坦为重点的焦点小组研究。

Adult perceptions of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: A Pakistan focus group study.

作者信息

Qureshi Maria, Mumtaz Mehwish

机构信息

QBAL, SMC (Single Member Company), Private, Limited, Pakistan.

Centre of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University di Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 22;38:102619. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102619. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102619
PMID:38375170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10874858/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evidence suggests that the popularity of Reduced Risk Products' (RRPs) is growing globally, and they are being considered as effective aids for tobacco cessation. To explore different policy options for reducing disease burden, this qualitative study investigates the perceptions of the urban adult population regarding the use of e-cigarettes (EC), combustible cigarettes, or both, and the factors influencing their choices.

METHODS

Twelve focus group discussions (FGDs), involving 132 participants, (68 male, 64 female), aged 18-60, were conducted from August to October 2022 in three metropolitan cities of Pakistan. Thematic analyses were conducted using the NVivo software. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research were employed for reporting and conducting purposes.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that while all participants discussed the health risks associated with combustible cigarettes and EC and expressed intensions to quit, many continued to smoke or vape. Reasons cited included perceived stress relief, alleviation of medical issues, or addiction hindering cessation efforts. Among the youth, EC use gained popularity due to its social acceptability and the inclusion of appealing flavours and fragrances. Additionally, participants managed the higher costs of ECs by sharing and pooling expenses. Some users of combustible cigarettes transitioned to ECs with the expectation of achieving better health outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes a foundation for undertaking quantitative research to identify pathways for assisting policymakers in mitigating the growing disease burden. Additionally, it aims to contribute to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 3a and 3.4 for Pakistan.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,风险降低型产品(RRPs)在全球范围内越来越受欢迎,并且它们被视为戒烟的有效辅助手段。为了探索减轻疾病负担的不同政策选择,这项定性研究调查了城市成年人口对使用电子烟(EC)、可燃香烟或两者兼用的看法,以及影响他们选择的因素。

方法

2022年8月至10月,在巴基斯坦的三个大城市进行了12次焦点小组讨论(FGDs),涉及132名参与者(68名男性,64名女性),年龄在18至60岁之间。使用NVivo软件进行了主题分析。报告和开展研究时采用了定性研究报告标准。

结果

研究结果表明,虽然所有参与者都讨论了可燃香烟和电子烟相关的健康风险,并表示有戒烟的意愿,但许多人仍继续吸烟或吸电子烟。提及的原因包括感觉能缓解压力、减轻医疗问题或成瘾阻碍了戒烟努力。在年轻人中,电子烟的使用因其社会可接受性以及有吸引人的口味和香味而变得流行。此外,参与者通过分摊和集中费用来应对电子烟较高的成本。一些可燃香烟使用者转而使用电子烟,期望能获得更好的健康结果。

结论

本研究为开展定量研究奠定了基础,以确定帮助政策制定者减轻不断增加的疾病负担的途径。此外,它旨在为巴基斯坦实现可持续发展目标3a和3.4做出贡献。