• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳实践警报(BPA)对微创子宫切除术后出院后阿片类药物处方的影响:一项质量改进研究。

Effect of Best Practice Alert (BPA) on Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Quality Improvement Study.

作者信息

Jankulov Alexandra, As-Sanie Sawsan, Zimmerman Christopher, Virzi Jessica, Srinivasan Sudharsan, Choe Hae Mi, Brummett Chad M

机构信息

Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI, USA.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 14;17:667-675. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S432262. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S432262
PMID:38375407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10875180/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of an electronic health record best practice alert (BPA) in decreasing gynecologic post-discharge opioid prescribing following benign minimally invasive hysterectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The BPA triggered for opioid orders >15 tablets. Prescribers' options included (1) decrease to 15 ≤ tablets; (2) remove the order/utilize a defaulted order set; or (3) override the alert.

RESULTS

332 patients were included. The BPA triggered 29 times. The following actions were taken among 16 patients for whom the BPA triggered: "override the alert" (n=13); "cancel the alert" (n=2); and 'remove the opioid order set' (n=1). 12/16 patients had discharge prescriptions: one patient received 20 tablets; two received 10 tablets; and nine received 15 tablets. Top reasons for over prescribing included concerns for pain control and lack of alternatives.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a post-discharge opioid prescribing BPA aligned opioid prescribing following benign minimally invasive hysterectomy with guideline recommendations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述电子健康记录最佳实践警报(BPA)在减少良性微创子宫切除术后出院时阿片类药物处方方面的有效性。

患者与方法

当阿片类药物处方超过15片时触发BPA。开处方者的选择包括:(1)减至15片≤;(2)取消订单/使用默认订单集;或(3)忽略警报。

结果

纳入332例患者。BPA触发了29次。在BPA触发的16例患者中采取了以下行动:“忽略警报”(n = 13);“取消警报”(n = 2);以及“移除阿片类药物订单集”(n = 1)。16例患者中有12例有出院处方:1例患者收到20片;2例收到10片;9例收到15片。过度开药的主要原因包括对疼痛控制的担忧和缺乏替代药物。

结论

实施出院后阿片类药物处方BPA使良性微创子宫切除术后的阿片类药物处方与指南建议保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b7/10875180/a43e969f3c03/JPR-17-667-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b7/10875180/0708802447a1/JPR-17-667-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b7/10875180/a43e969f3c03/JPR-17-667-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b7/10875180/0708802447a1/JPR-17-667-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64b7/10875180/a43e969f3c03/JPR-17-667-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Best Practice Alert (BPA) on Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Quality Improvement Study.最佳实践警报(BPA)对微创子宫切除术后出院后阿片类药物处方的影响:一项质量改进研究。
J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 14;17:667-675. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S432262. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Opioid use after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology patients.妇科恶性肿瘤患者微创子宫切除术后阿片类药物的使用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
4
Opioid use after laparoscopic hysterectomy: prescriptions, patient use, and a predictive calculator.腹腔镜子宫切除术后阿片类药物的使用:处方、患者使用和预测计算器。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):259.e1-259.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Opioid Prescription and Patient Use After Gynecologic Procedures: A Survey of Patients and Providers.妇科手术后的阿片类药物处方和患者使用情况:患者和提供者的调查。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):684-688. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Evaluation of Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Use Following Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: A Prospective Cohort Study.良性指征子宫切除术后阿片类药物处方模式及使用情况评估:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Mar;44(3):240-246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
By Default: The Effect of Prepopulated Prescription Quantities on Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department.默认情况下:预填处方数量对急诊科阿片类药物处方的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):392-397. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.33798. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
A randomized controlled noninferiority trial of reduced vs routine opioid prescription after prolapse repair.经阴道脱垂修补术后减少与常规阿片类药物处方的随机对照非劣效性试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):547.e1-547.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Prescription Opioid Use for Acute Pain and Persistent Opioid Use After Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.妇科手术后急性疼痛的处方阿片类药物使用及持续阿片类药物使用:一项系统评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 1;141(4):681-696. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005104. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Shared decision-making in opioid prescribing for minimally invasive hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.微创子宫切除术阿片类药物处方的共享决策:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Opioid Manag. 2022 Sep-Oct;18(5):475-485. doi: 10.5055/jom.2022.0741.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Care Physicians' Perspective on SGLT2 Inhibitors for Chronic Kidney Disease.基层医疗医生对用于慢性肾脏病的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂的看法。
Kidney Med. 2025 Apr 3;7(6):101002. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101002. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Increasing Naloxone Prescribing in the Emergency Department Through Education and Electronic Medical Record Work-Aids.通过教育和电子病历辅助工具增加急诊科纳洛酮的处方量。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Jun;47(6):364-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Effect of an Electronic Health Record "Nudge" on Opioid Prescribing and Electronic Health Record Keystrokes in Ambulatory Care.
电子健康记录“提示”对门诊护理中阿片类药物处方和电子健康记录按键操作的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06276-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Assessment of a quality improvement intervention to decrease opioid prescribing in a regional health system.评估一项质量改进干预措施,以减少区域卫生系统中阿片类药物的处方。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Mar;30(3):251-259. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011295. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
The effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change: A systematic literature review.行为经济学干预措施对医生行为改变的有效性:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0234149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234149. eCollection 2020.
6
Chronic opioid use in women following hysterectomy: Patterns and predictors.女性子宫切除术后慢性阿片类药物使用:模式和预测因素。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):493-503. doi: 10.1002/pds.4972. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
7
The impact of an automated antibiotic stewardship intervention for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia utilizing the electronic health record.利用电子健康记录实施自动化抗生素管理干预对金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症管理的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Apr 1;75(4):1054-1060. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz518.
8
Use of Procalcitonin and a Respiratory Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel to Reduce Antibiotic Use via an Electronic Medical Record Alert.降钙素原和呼吸聚合酶链反应联合检测在电子病历预警下减少抗生素使用的临床研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1684-1689. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1042.
9
Does Use of Electronic Alerts for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) to Identify Patients With Sepsis Improve Mortality?电子警报系统用于全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 以识别脓毒症患者是否能提高死亡率?
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
10
Assessment of Opioid Prescribing Practices Before and After Implementation of a Health System Intervention to Reduce Opioid Overprescribing.评估卫生系统干预措施实施前后减少阿片类药物过度处方的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182908. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2908.