• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭还能继续保障儿童的权利吗?

[Can the family continue to guarantee the rights of children?].

作者信息

Lempp R

出版信息

Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1985;13(1):43-55.

PMID:3837559
Abstract

The legal position of children is based essentially on the assumption that the family can always safeguard the child's welfare in confrontations with a third party. Therefore children have not been granted autonomous legal status; their interests are protected by the term "the child's best interest", which although incorporated into law is not defined. In recent years more attention has been paid to the legal status of children, and a certain amount of autonomy has been granted, although not without contest. This tendency is an expression of a change in family structure, which until recently conformed to the ideal of the nineteenth century bourgeois family. Our own limited investigations show, in addition to already well known demographic changes, that in the course of our century young children have become more and more limited in their opportunities to form strong emotional bonds. Only since then has the dual bond of early childhood been recognized as being of primary importance. The family is becoming increasingly inadequate. Children are therefore increasingly endangered by the death or divorce of their parents. As a result it is essential that better legal provision be made to ensure that they are regarded as autonomous individuals.

摘要

儿童的法律地位基本上基于这样一种假设,即家庭在与第三方对抗时总能保障儿童的福利。因此,儿童并未被赋予自主的法律地位;他们的利益由“儿童最大利益”这一术语来保护,尽管该术语已被纳入法律,但并未给出定义。近年来,人们对儿童的法律地位给予了更多关注,并且赋予了一定程度的自主权,尽管并非没有争议。这种趋势是家庭结构变化的一种体现,直到最近,家庭结构都符合19世纪资产阶级家庭的理想模式。我们自己有限的调查表明,除了早已为人所知的人口结构变化之外,在本世纪,幼儿建立牢固情感纽带的机会越来越有限。从那时起,幼儿期的双重纽带才被视为至关重要。家庭正变得越来越力不从心。因此,儿童因父母死亡或离婚而面临的危险日益增加。所以,必须做出更好的法律规定,以确保他们被视为自主个体。

相似文献

1
[Can the family continue to guarantee the rights of children?].家庭还能继续保障儿童的权利吗?
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1985;13(1):43-55.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Fostering permanency of children in out-of-home care: psycho-legal aspects.促进儿童在家庭外照料中的永久性安置:心理法律方面。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988;16(4):343-57.
5
Psychoanalysis and the early beginnings of residential treatment for troubled youth.精神分析与问题青少年住院治疗的早期开端。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2004 Apr;13(2):237-54. doi: 10.1016/S1056-4993(03)00115-9.
6
Federal Act Amending Law Relating to Children (Children's Law Amendment Act), 15 March 1989.1989年3月15日《联邦儿童相关法律修正案》(《儿童法修正案》)。
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:105.
7
The girl child and law.女童与法律
Soc Change. 1995 Jun-Sep;25(2-3):119-23.
8
[Conflicts between parenteral expectations and children's needs in child guidance clinics].
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1995 Nov;44(9):359-65.
9
The mistreated child.
Calif Med. 1963 Aug;99(2):98-103.
10
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.