• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术在腰椎手术中的文献计量学分析。

Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery.

机构信息

School of Graduates, Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Feb;28(3):907-923. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35328.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202402_35328
PMID:38375731
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis to examine the current condition, areas of interest, and rising trends of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery (TLIF), as well as its importance in associated research domains.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive collection of academic papers on the use of TLIF was obtained from the Web of Science between January 1, 2000, and November 5, 2023. Then, using a variety of tools like HisCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix package, a bibliometric study was carried out. This study included the collection of information on country, institution, author, journal, and keywords.

RESULTS

A comprehensive analysis was undertaken on a total of 1,907 publications obtained from 181 journals, encompassing the contributions of 7,232 authors affiliated with 1,775 institutes spanning 57 countries/regions. Notably, the USA exhibited the highest number of publications, with 763 (40.03%) articles on TLIF. The most productive institution was Rush University, with 96 (5.03%) publications. The author with the highest publication output was Singh, Kern with 75 (3.93%) publications. World Neurosurgery demonstrated the highest level of productivity, having published a total of 211 (11.06%) articles. The most frequently used keywords were "TLIF", "spondylolisthesis" and "complication". Meanwhile, "workflow", "technical note" and "hidden blood loss" have been identified as the research frontiers for the forthcoming years.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides a thorough evaluation of current research trends and advancements in TLIF. It includes relevant research findings and emphasizes collaborative efforts among authors, institutions, and countries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在进行文献计量分析,以考察经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)在腰椎手术中的现状、研究领域和发展趋势及其在相关研究领域的重要性。

材料与方法

从 Web of Science 数据库中获取了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 5 日期间关于 TLIF 使用的大量学术论文,然后使用 HisCite、VOSviewer、CiteSpace 和 bibliometrix 包等多种工具进行文献计量学研究,包括国家、机构、作者、期刊和关键词等信息的收集。

结果

对来自 181 种期刊的 1907 篇论文进行了全面分析,涉及来自 57 个国家/地区的 7232 位作者和 1775 个机构。值得注意的是,美国发表的 TLIF 相关文章数量最多,共 763 篇(40.03%);发表文章数量最多的机构是拉什大学,共 96 篇(5.03%);发文量最高的作者是 Singh,Kern,共 75 篇(3.93%);发表文章数量最多的期刊是 World Neurosurgery,共 211 篇(11.06%)。使用频率最高的关键词是“TLIF”、“滑脱”和“并发症”;而“工作流程”、“技术说明”和“隐性失血”则被认为是未来几年的研究前沿。

结论

本文全面评估了 TLIF 的当前研究趋势和进展,包括相关研究结果,并强调了作者、机构和国家之间的合作努力。

相似文献

1
Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术在腰椎手术中的文献计量学分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Feb;28(3):907-923. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35328.
2
Bibliometric analysis of interspinous device in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.棘突间装置治疗腰椎退行性疾病的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037351.
3
Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: research status, trends, and future directions.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的文献计量分析:研究现状、趋势及未来方向
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):906-918. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0155.
4
Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on transforaminal full-endoscopic approach on the spine for the last two-decades.二十年来经椎间孔全内镜脊柱手术的文献计量分析与研究趋势描述。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2647-2661. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07661-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research relating to minimally invasive spine surgery reported over the period 2000-2022.2000年至2022年期间报道的与微创脊柱手术相关研究的文献计量学和可视化分析。
Digit Health. 2023 May 4;9:20552076231173562. doi: 10.1177/20552076231173562. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.经皮内镜机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PE RA-TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱:技术说明和两年临床结果。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E73-E86.
7
Global and Current Research Trends of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy/Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study.全球及当前单侧双通道内镜/双通道内镜脊柱手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的研究趋势:文献计量学和可视化研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):635-643. doi: 10.1111/os.13216. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ级退变性腰椎滑脱的成本效果分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Aug;15(2):138-43. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10562. Epub 2011 May 6.
9
A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).一项腰椎滑脱症手术治疗的随机对照多中心试验方案:腰椎椎间融合试验(LIFT)。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 6;17(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1280-8.
10
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric and visual analysis of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Knowledge structure, research status, and future trends.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的文献计量学与可视化分析:知识结构、研究现状与未来趋势
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 14;104(7):e41510. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041510.
2
Bibliometric analysis of pyroptosis in pathogenesis and treatment of acute lung injury.细胞焦亡在急性肺损伤发病机制及治疗中的文献计量学分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 22;11:1488796. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1488796. eCollection 2024.