文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

二十年来经椎间孔全内镜脊柱手术的文献计量分析与研究趋势描述。

Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on transforaminal full-endoscopic approach on the spine for the last two-decades.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedics, Thai Red Cross Society, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Sriracha, Thailand.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2647-2661. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07661-0. Epub 2023 Mar 27.


DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07661-0
PMID:36973463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the current development status of transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery (TFES) by exploring and analyzing the published literature to obtain an overview of this field and discover the evolution and emerging topics that are underrepresented. METHODS: Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science Core Collection between January 2002 and November 2022. The descriptive and evaluative analyses of authors, institutes, countries, journals, keywords, and references are compiled. The quantity of research productivity was measured by the number of publications that were published. A quality indicator was thought to be the number of citations. In the bibliometric analysis of authors, areas, institutes, and references, we calculated and ranked the research impact by various metrics, such as the h-index and m-index. RESULTS: A total of 628 articles were identified in the field of TFES by the 18.73% annual growth rate of research on the subject from 2002 to 2022, constituting the documents are by 1961 authors affiliated with 661 institutions in 42 countries or regions and published in 117 journals. The USA (n = 0.20) has the highest international collaboration rate, South Korea has the highest H-index value (h = 33), and China is ranked as the most productive country (n = 348). Brown univ., Tongji univ., and Wooridul Spine represented the most productive institutes ranked by the number of publications. Wooridul Spine Hospital demonstrated the highest quality of paper publication. The Pain Physician had the highest h-index (n = 18), and the most cited journal with the earliest publication year in the area of FEDS is Spine (t = 1855). CONCLUSION: The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery over the past 20 years. It has shown a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and international collaborating countries. South Korea, the United States, and China dominate the related areas. A growing body of evidence has revealed that TFES has leapfrogged from its infancy stage and gradually entered a mature development stage.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过对已发表文献进行探讨和分析,评估经椎间孔全内镜脊柱手术(TFES)的当前发展状况,从而对该领域进行概述,并发现处于发展初期的新兴主题。

方法:使用 Bibliometrix、CiteSpace 和 VOSviewer,我们对 2002 年 1 月至 2022 年 11 月期间从 Web of Science 核心合集选取的文献进行了计量学数据分析。我们对作者、机构、国家、期刊、关键词和参考文献等进行了描述性和评估性分析。研究产出的数量通过发表文献的数量来衡量,而质量指标则认为是引用次数。在作者、领域、机构和参考文献的计量分析中,我们使用 h 指数和 m 指数等各种指标计算和排名研究影响力。

结果:2002 年至 2022 年,TFES 领域的研究以每年 18.73%的速度增长,共确定了 628 篇文献,由来自 42 个国家/地区的 661 个机构的 1961 名作者撰写,发表在 117 种期刊上。国际合作率最高的是美国(n=0.20),韩国的 H 指数值最高(h=33),中国是发表文献最多的国家(n=348)。发表文献数量最多的机构是布朗大学、同济大学和 Wooridul 脊柱医院。Wooridul 脊柱医院的论文发表质量最高。《疼痛医师》(Pain Physician)的 h 指数最高(n=18),而该领域最早发表文献的期刊是《脊柱》(Spine)(t=1855)。

结论:该计量学研究显示,过去 20 年来,经椎间孔全内镜脊柱手术的研究呈增长趋势,作者、机构和国际合作国家的数量都显著增加。韩国、美国和中国在相关领域占据主导地位。越来越多的证据表明,TFES 已经从起步阶段跃升到成熟发展阶段。

相似文献

[1]
Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on transforaminal full-endoscopic approach on the spine for the last two-decades.

Eur Spine J. 2023-8

[2]
A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.

Neurospine. 2023-3

[3]
Worldwide research productivity in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery: a bibliometric study.

Eur Spine J. 2019-10-23

[4]
Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research relating to minimally invasive spine surgery reported over the period 2000-2022.

Digit Health. 2023-5-4

[5]
Global and Current Research Trends of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy/Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study.

Orthop Surg. 2022-4

[6]
Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis.

Front Surg. 2022-9-2

[7]
Research trends in endoscopic applications in early gastric cancer: A bibliometric analysis of studies published from 2012 to 2022.

Front Oncol. 2023-4-11

[8]
Bibliometric analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spine surgery.

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024-2

[9]
Research Trends in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Bibliometric and Network Visualization Study.

Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2022-8-31

[10]
Global Trends in Research of Gouty Arthritis Over Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Front Immunol. 2022

引用本文的文献

[1]
AO Spine Knowledge Forums Promote Collaboration and Elevate the Impact of Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Global Spine J. 2025-6-13

[2]
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.

Neurospine. 2024-12

[3]
Bibliometric analysis of skeletal muscle ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) research from 1986 to 2022.

Heliyon. 2024-9-5

[4]
Bibliometric analysis of interspinous device in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-3-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy and Microscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Thoracic Disc Herniation.

Neurospine. 2022-9

[2]
Current Status and research hotspots in the field of full endoscopic spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis.

Front Surg. 2022-9-2

[3]
Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Sciatica: Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022-9-15

[4]
Application of electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a cohort study.

Eur Spine J. 2022-10

[5]
Advantages of Revision Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Patients who have Previously Undergone Posterior Spine Surgery.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023-11

[6]
Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Under General and Local Anesthesia: A Single-Center Study.

Front Surg. 2022-4-19

[7]
Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-3-1

[8]
Comparative Analysis of 3 Types of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis, Uniportal-, Biportal Endoscopy, and Microsurgery: Radiologic and Midterm Clinical Outcomes.

Neurospine. 2022-3

[9]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[10]
Novel electromagnetic-based navigation for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis reduces radiation exposure and enhances surgical efficiency compared to fluoroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Ann Transl Med. 2020-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索